Sentence examples for topic journal from inspiring English sources

The 100 most cited articles were further analysed by topic, journal, author, year and institution.

They are a well-known research tools for systematic analyses (van Raan 2005), which mostly employed to procure bibliographical data within a specific field, institute, topic, journal, authors or country by utilizing quantitative analyses and statistics methods (Wallin 2005).

Raman spectroscopy is currently recognized as a flexible, accurate and high sensitive technique, that is currently widely applied in a plenty of domains, as recently excellent reviewed the current [13] and former editor of the topic journal [14 16].

Consistency of title and abstract and potential interest of the subject for readers The paper deals with a particularly relevant and controversial topic: journal ratings as predictors of articles quality in no-bibliometrics areas (architecture, arts and humanities, history and philosophy, law and sociology and political science).

Lu's paper fits into Category 2 of the ways flawed contrarian papers get published in scientific journals – by submitting to an off-topic journal.

That Bast and Spencer refer to Monckton and Legates' fundamentally wrong paper in an obscure off-topic journal as "more reliable research" reveals their bias in only considering denial "reliable".

In the second approach, contrarians will often publish a flawed paper in an off-topic journal where it's less likely to be subjected to peer-review by experts in the applicable scientific field.

For example, in order to reject the findings of the paper my colleagues and I published last year finding a 97% consensus on human-caused global warming in the peer-reviewed literature, Bast and Spencer referenced a critical comment subsequently published by David Legates et al. in an obscure off-topic journal called Science and Education.

We documented several examples of this approach in our Cosmopolis paper as well, including several papers published in off-topic journals by Roy Spencer and Richard Lindzen.

The editors of off-topic journals may be unable to identify referees with adequate climate expertise to review these climate papers, making it more likely that the sorts of fundamental flaws that were the basis of Lu's paper won't be identified during the peer-review process, and hence more likely that this flawed research will be published in off-topic journals.

However, when these papers are published in off-topic journals, that's a red flag that they may not have been subjected to rigorous expert peer-review, and that their claims should be strongly scrutinized before being uncritically passed along for public consumption.