Sentence examples for top frequencies from inspiring English sources

Although log-barrier algorithm estimates correctly the frequencies for harmonic signals, it does not estimate correctly the parameters of 1-D modal signals and the solution is less sparse than the solutions provided by SBR and OMP. Figure 2 Spectrum of y and its estimates by SBR, OMP, and log-barrier (top), frequencies and damping factors of estimated modes (bottom).

We identified the top 3 frequencies of each group of comments (positive versus negative comments and first versus second period) and we examined whether there were shifts in these top frequencies between the two periods.

Based on these top frequencies of assigned codes per group, we could not identify relevant shifts in the number of comments between the two periods; similar topics were positively and negatively mentioned when participants rated videotaped consultations from the two periods.

The SF intensity is quantified as fop, the top frequency of the range spread F trace.

The SF intensity is quantified in terms of the parameter fop, the top frequency of the range spread F trace.

Here, the spread F intensity is represented by the parameter fop (the top frequency of a range spreading F layer trace).

Direct channel links are shown in black solid lines whereas interference channels are plotted in gray dashed lines Fig. 2 Top: frequency-domain (post-FFT) IA decoding.

The parameters used in our analyses are the top frequency (ftEs) and blanketing frequency (fbEs) of the Es layer as measured over São Luís, Brazil (2.33°S, 44.2°W, dip: −4.5°) by digital ionosonde.

Matsushita (1951) found that in the dip equatorial region, the latitudinal variation of the top frequency reflected from the sporadic layer, fEs is very similar to that of ΔH.

The spread F intensity is quantified in terms of the parameter fop (the top frequency of the range spread F trace) that was read from each ionogram (Abdu et al. 2012).

For the two-component signal s(t) + s(t - Δt), the ideal TFD (Figure 3) will take the form Figure 2 A Gabor logon in time ( top ), frequency ( left ), and joint time-frequency domain using the SPWVD ( center ). Figure 3 Two Gabor logons in time, frequency, and time-frequency (SPWVD).