Exact(20)
The tool was evaluated by users and the qualitative results of the evaluation are presented in the article.
Inter-rater reliability of the data collection tool was evaluated using Cohen's kappa coefficient.
The tool was evaluated using preimplementation and postimplementation cohorts at a single urban academic teaching hospital.
The tool was evaluated with three real-world use cases from different domains including seismic analysis and agronomy.
Based on these categories, faulty codes were temporary injected in three different programs and each tool was evaluated against such a fault version.
Based on these criteria each tool was evaluated against six fault categories: data faults, control faults, interface faults, measurement faults, duplicated code, and code convention violations.
Similar(40)
The performance of the tool is evaluated with respect to the aforementioned measurements.
Equations about the thermal and the exergetic performance of the collector are given in order to determine how the results of the simulation tool are evaluated.
Both the framework and the configuration tool are evaluated in terms of several performance and usability criteria.
The application generator/tailoring tool is evaluated with novice end users and experts to demonstrate its effectiveness.
Besides, the tool is evaluated through a study case based on a real railway route, obtaining an overall improvement of 82.33% in time invested over the existing process.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com