As most tools performed better overall on the datasets with a smaller standard deviation, the comparison of tool performance, between Human Chromosome 21 and Arabidopsis, provided here is limited to the sd 15 datasets.
The mode of cryogenic treatment process affects the tool performance.
To increase productivity and reduce production cost, cutting tool performance should be enhanced.
Comparative, quantitative analysis of tool performance was not feasible due to the heterogeneity of study design, poor reporting and infrequent within-study statistical comparison of tool performance.
Many new algorithms1,2 have been developed to accommodate today's flood of genomic data; however, systematic assessment of software tool performance remains a challenging and laborious process3.
One large U.S. academic medical center did this by including tool performance measures in the executive dashboard, making its benefits clear to top management.
Operation capability of tool inserts is compared with tool performance data.
For the tool performance the microscopic cutting edge shape is very important.
However, the effect of this approach is hardly ever measured at the hand tool performance level.
An improvement in the efficiency of the cutting process requires high tool performance.
A slurry distribution index was developed as an indicator of injection tool performance.
