took responsibilities for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "took responsibilities for" is not correct in standard English; it should be "took responsibility for." You can use it when discussing accountability or obligations related to a task or situation.
Example: "After the project failed, she took responsibility for the oversight in planning."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Later, the Aksa Martyrs Brigades took responsibilities for the shooting.

The New York Times

In his later years, a nuncio at Cologne took responsibilities for the financial administration of the archdiocese, and Ernst's nephew, Ferdinand of Bavaria, was elected to the Cathedral Chapter, the Wittelsbach heir-apparent.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

No group took responsibility for the attack.

The New York Times

But he took responsibility for the divorce.

The New York Times - Sports

We took responsibility for what happened.

The New York Times

The Taliban took responsibility for the attack.

The New York Times

No group took responsibility for the bombings.

The New York Times

"You took responsibility for her".

The New York Times - Magazine

Maoist rebels took responsibility for the attacks.

The New York Times

The Shabab took responsibility for the attack.

The New York Times

The Taliban took responsibility for the flogging.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing duties, ensure you use the singular form, "responsibility", to maintain grammatical accuracy.

Common error

Avoid pluralizing "responsibility" when describing the act of taking on a duty. Use the singular form to maintain correctness. For example, say "took responsibility for the project" instead of "took responsibilities for the project".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "took responsibilities for" incorrectly uses the plural form of "responsibility". Its intended function is to describe the act of assuming duties related to something, but the grammar is non-standard. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase is not correct and should be written as "took responsibility for".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Science

34%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "took responsibilities for" is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is "took responsibility for". While the phrase appears in some sources, it's essential to use the singular form of "responsibility" to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is non-standard. For better alternatives, consider using "assumed responsibility for" or "accepted responsibility for". Always ensure that the language is precise and adheres to standard English grammar, especially in formal contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assumed responsibility for

Replaces "took" with "assumed", implying a formal acceptance of duties.

accepted responsibility for

Emphasizes the act of willingly acknowledging and taking on a duty.

took on the responsibility for

Highlights the act of embracing a specific duty.

shouldered the responsibility for

Implies bearing the weight or burden of a duty.

managed the responsibilities of

Focuses on the handling and oversight of various duties.

oversaw the responsibilities of

Highlights the supervisory role in managing duties.

handled the responsibilities of

Focuses on managing tasks and duties effectively.

executed the responsibilities of

Emphasizes the active performance and completion of duties.

addressed the responsibilities of

Focuses on dealing with or managing specific duties or concerns.

carried out the responsibilities of

Highlights the execution and fulfillment of duties.

FAQs

Is it correct to say "took responsibilities for"?

No, the correct phrasing is "took responsibility for". The term "responsibility" should be singular in this context.

What's the difference between "took responsibility for" and "assumed responsibility for"?

"Took responsibility for" generally implies acknowledging and accepting a duty after an event or situation, while "assumed responsibility for" suggests proactively taking on a duty or role.

How to use "took responsibility for" in a sentence?

Here's an example: "After the error was discovered, the manager took responsibility for the mistake and implemented new procedures."

What can I say instead of "took responsibilities for"?

Use the correct form "took responsibility for" or alternatives like "assumed responsibility for" or "accepted responsibility for".