took command of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "took command of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing someone assuming control or leadership over a group, organization, or situation. Example: "After the previous leader resigned, she took command of the team and implemented new strategies."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

KzS Ernst-Ludwig Thienemann, the ship's final commander, took command of Admiral Scheer in April 1944.

Wikipedia

For his efforts Jervis was promoted commander and took command of.

Wikipedia

Amongst them was Lieutenant Commander Zenji Orita, who took command of I-177 after Nakagawa.

Wikipedia

He returned to Nauvoo and took command of the church.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In late June, Yingling took command of an artillery battalion.

The New York Times

FitzRoy took command of the Beagle under odd circumstances.

The New York Times - Books

Aili and Passananti took command of the race early.

The New York Times - Sports

Cink took command of the playoff from the start.

The New York Times - Sports

He took command of the point early, taking huge cuts at the ball and converting.

The New York Times - Sports

In 1942 Westmoreland took command of the 34th Field Artillery, a battalion of 155mm towed howitzers.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In 1993 Dallaire took command of the UN Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR).

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "took command of", ensure that the context clearly establishes what entity or group was taken command of. For example, specify "took command of the battalion" rather than just "took command".

Common error

While similar, "took command of" implies a formal transfer of authority, often within a hierarchical structure. Avoid using it when describing a temporary or informal assumption of responsibility; "took charge of" is more appropriate in those cases.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "took command of" functions as a verb phrase indicating the action of assuming authority or control. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is correct and usable in written English, supported by numerous real-world examples demonstrating its active use.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Wiki

32%

Encyclopedias

24%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Science

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "took command of" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe assuming authority or control, as confirmed by Ludwig. It is most frequently found in news, encyclopedias, and Wiki articles and maintains a generally neutral register. When using the phrase, it's important to specify what is being commanded to avoid ambiguity and to be mindful of the subtle differences between "took command of" and alternatives like "took charge of". Remember, it generally implies a formal change in leadership or control.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assumed leadership of

This phrase directly emphasizes the leadership aspect, focusing on guidance and direction.

assumed control over

This alternative implies a more general acquisition of control, lacking the direct leadership connotation.

took control over

This option is less specific regarding position and power, indicating control in a broad sense.

took charge of

This phrase suggests taking responsibility and initiative, potentially in a temporary or informal capacity.

took the helm of

This option is more metaphorical, suggesting guidance and direction, especially in organizations.

became the leader of

This version is more explicit and descriptive, lacking the conciseness of the original phrase.

assumed responsibility for

This alternative highlights accountability and oversight, rather than direct control.

was placed in command of

This suggests that the individual was assigned command by an external entity.

inherited the command of

This phrase indicates the acquisition of command through succession, inheritance or as a consequence of someone else's departure.

acceded to the leadership of

This version suggests a formal or ceremonial transfer of power, implying a structured process.

FAQs

What does "took command of" mean?

The phrase "took command of" means to assume a position of authority and control over a group, organization, or situation. It implies a formal transfer of leadership.

What can I say instead of "took command of"?

You can use alternatives like "assumed control over", "assumed leadership of", or "took charge of" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "has command of" instead of "took command of"?

Yes, "has command of" is grammatically correct, but it indicates present authority, while "took command of" refers to a past action of assuming authority. Therefore, it depends on the time frame you want to emphasize.

What's the difference between "took command of" and "took control of"?

While both phrases imply assuming authority, "took command of" suggests a formal transfer of leadership, particularly in structured organizations. "Took control of" is broader and can refer to gaining control over a situation or object, not necessarily implying leadership.