The phrase "too generalized" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to refer to a statement or idea that is not specific enough and lacks detail or nuance. It can also imply that the statement is oversimplified or does not take into account individual differences or complexities. Example: "The argument presented in the article is too generalized and fails to consider the diverse perspectives of all stakeholders."
She plays the role with warmth but in too generalized a manner.
Dr. Helen Wallace, deputy director of GeneWatch U.K., a group that led opposition to Sciona's test, said the advice was too generalized to be worth paying for.
Though theplaintiff discovered the vein, she could not keep it to herself; sodefined, the theme was too generalized an abstraction from what shewrote.
At JPMorgan and Citigroup, disclosures are too generalized to clearly see what the three main contributors are to sales and trading revenue.
These moments suggest a finer directorial eye than is typically evident in "Saudade," which feels at once too personal and too generalized to tell any true stories of its own.
In a draft that had been sent to del Castillo around Christmas, there was a note from Fine, remarking on the long drive to see El Chapo: "DESCRIPTION FEELS A LITTLE TOO GENERALIZED.
This paper adopts an internalization theory perspective, meant to improve the design of MP studies, and cautions against assuming too quickly a generalized MP relationship.
These 800-plus pages hold too many broadly generalized, somewhat bromidic observations about a subject universally acknowledged to have its limits: the nature, culture and very rich hours of Washington, compared with other cities.
Robinson thinks that traditional ethical approaches to specific problems like poverty are too abstract and generalized to motivate enough action to elimate the actual suffering caused by poverty.
Their result implies that if we found too many significant generalized residuals for second-order marginals for items belonging to common stimulus (also referred to as testlets by, for example, Bradlow et al. 1999), then application of a model like the testlet model (Bradlow et al. 1999) would lead to better fit to the NAEP data.
Some critics argue that the semantic values generated by generalized 2D semantics are too unstable to provide plausible conditions for semantic competence with a meaning or a concept.
