tolerable standard

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "tolerable standard" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a level of quality or performance that is acceptable but not exceptional. Example: "The product meets a tolerable standard, making it suitable for basic use, but it may not satisfy more demanding customers."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

A tolerable standard of honesty in the force is certainly not at present attainable; but the Federal Enforcement Commissioner argues that this is the inevitable accompaniment of the unprecedented law, and he insists that no law so drastic has ever been so largely enforced.

The Guardian

It is also extremely higher than maximum tolerable standard of USEPA (1993) and European regulation standards (Ewers 1991) as in Table 4.

Environmental Systems Research

e.   (N − m + 1 ) (N − m ) }. Therein, | x i m − x j m | denotes the distance between points x i m and x j m in the space of dimension, m, r represent the tolerable standard deviation of the time series, and N is the length of the time series.

BioMed Research International

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

The 6-MU regimen was as tolerable as standard 3-MU regimen for Taiwanese patients.

BMC Infectious Diseases

Perhaps these risks would be tolerable if the standard drug benefit authorized by the bills were generous.

The New York Times

The watershed area for which the rate of observed soil loss is not tolerable by any standard (Morgan (2005)) is categorized as 'severe'veryery severe' and 'extremely severe' soil loss areas.

Environmental Systems Research

Based on MEHP concentrations, the investigators estimated that 40.5% of the PVC plant workers had DEHP exposure exceeding the European Union's tolerable daily intake standard of 37.0 μg/kg body weight.

Environmental Health Perspectives

If we start saying that anything less than the highest standard is tolerable, we're really destroying democracy.

The New Yorker

We found that the increased mean dose-density of bleomycin of 1.40 (range 0.98 1.5; median 1.49) relative to standard BEP was tolerable.

British Journal of Cancer

MCs: Microcystins; NODs: Nodularins; MC-LR: Microcystin-LR; MC-RR: Microcystin-RR; MC-YR: Microcystin- YR; WHO: World Health Organization; i.p.: Intra peritoneal injection; OTA: Ochratoxin A; Afaltoxins-B1: AFB1; MS: Mass spectrum; LC-MS: Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry; ESI: Electron spray ionization; SIM: Selected ion monitoring; SE: Standard error; TDI: Tolerable daily intake.

BMC Veterinary Research

Van Laethem et al, in a feasibility study, found that gemcitabine (300 mg m−2) given weekly with split-course radiation (40 Gy/20 fractions over 6 weeks) was tolerable following three cycles of standard dose gemcitabine (1000 mg m−2 day 1 and 8 q 21 days) (Van Laethem et al, 2003).

British Journal of Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "tolerable standard", ensure that the context clearly defines what is being considered "tolerable". This helps avoid ambiguity and ensures your audience understands the specific level of acceptability you are referring to.

Common error

Avoid using "tolerable standard" when a higher level of quality or performance is expected or required. It suggests a minimal level of acceptance, which may not be appropriate in all situations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "tolerable standard" functions as a noun phrase, where "tolerable" is an adjective modifying the noun "standard". It describes a level or degree of quality that is acceptable but not necessarily excellent. Ludwig AI confirms this usage pattern.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "tolerable standard" is a phrase used to describe an acceptable, but not necessarily exceptional, level of quality or performance. While grammatically correct, its frequency is rare. It is used across various contexts, including science and news, according to the Ludwig AI analysis. When using this phrase, clarity is key to ensure the audience understands the specific level of acceptability. Be aware of the implications: it suggests minimal acceptance, which may not always be the intended message. Consider alternatives like "acceptable level" or "adequate benchmark" for nuanced meanings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

acceptable level

Focuses on the acceptability of something, without necessarily implying a comparison to a standard.

adequate benchmark

Highlights that something is just sufficient to meet a basic requirement.

permissible criterion

Emphasizes that something is allowed or permitted according to a specific criterion.

satisfactory norm

Suggests something meets a basic level of satisfaction within a given norm.

bearable threshold

Implies something is endurable but not necessarily ideal, reaching the limit of what can be tolerated.

reasonable gauge

Indicates something provides a fair or sensible measurement against which something else is evaluated.

passable measure

Suggests something is just good enough to pass or be accepted.

sufficient yardstick

Highlights that something provides enough of a basis for comparison or evaluation.

allowable limit

Focuses on the limit or boundary within which something is permitted.

serviceable average

Implies something is functional and meets a basic need when compared to an average.

FAQs

How can I use "tolerable standard" in a sentence?

You can use "tolerable standard" to describe a level of quality or performance that is acceptable but not exceptional. For example, "The product meets a tolerable standard, making it suitable for basic use."

What is another way to say "tolerable standard"?

Alternatives to "tolerable standard" include "acceptable level", "adequate benchmark", or "satisfactory norm" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to aim for a "tolerable standard" or a higher standard?

Whether to aim for a "tolerable standard" versus a higher standard depends on the specific goals and resources available. A "tolerable standard" may be appropriate when resources are limited or when a basic level of performance is sufficient. However, aiming for a higher standard can lead to improved quality and better outcomes.

What does it mean if something is described as meeting a "tolerable standard"?

If something is described as meeting a "tolerable standard", it means that it meets the minimum requirements or expectations to be considered acceptable, but there may be room for improvement. It suggests a level of performance that is adequate but not necessarily exceptional.