A recent Bank of England study of banking crises since the late 1980s in Japan, Finland, Norway and Sweden found that the average bank ate up 4.5% of risk-adjusted assets.Adding these two elements together implies that a typical bank should run with core equity capital of 8-9% of risk-adjusted assets, which would be eaten away to 4% during a crisis.
The deal, and the speed with which it came together, implies that Mr. Zuckerberg saw Instagram's meteoric rise as a potential threat, whether as a stand-alone service or in the hands of one of its rivals like Google or Twitter.
The Kadec-Klee property, that is, for any sequence { x n } with x n ⇀ x and ∥ x n ∥ → ∥ x ∥ together implies ∥ x n − x ∥ → 0. Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of H.
(12), (13), and (14) together implies that the evolution of the world economy under the perfect foresight dynamics is described by the following time one map k 1 t + 1 k 2 t + 1 p t + 1 = N ( k 1 t, k 2 t, p t ) = n 1 ( k 1 t, k 2 t, p t ) n 2 ( k 1 t, k 2 t, p t ) n 3 ( k 1 t, k 2 t, p t ), (15).
It is also known that H satisfies (1) Opial's condition, that is, for any sequence { x n } with x n ⇀ x, the inequality lim inf n → ∞ ∥ x n − x ∥ < lim inf n → ∞ ∥ x n − y ∥ holds for every y ∈ H with y ≠ x. (2) The Kadec-Klee property, that is, for any sequence { x n } with x n ⇀ x and ∥ x n ∥ → ∥ x ∥ together implies ∥ x n − x ∥ → 0. .
end{aligned} (4.26) In particular, putting (4.25) and (4.26) together implies that by taking sigma_{0} quad text{such that}quad 0< frac{1}{lambda}leq sigma_{0}< 1 it follows that begin{aligned}& min_{tin[eta,T]_{q,omega}} biggl[1+frac{(lambda -1)(t-omega_{0})}{Lambda} biggr] varphi(x) & quad = sigma_{0}max_{tin[omega_{0},T]_{q,omega}} biggl[1+ frac {(lambda-1)(t-omega_{0})}{Lambda} biggr]varphi(x).
A $2.25-billion line of credit to the Treasury, tax advantages and low capital requirements together imply a government guarantee that translates into lower borrowing costs.
together imply the growth condition (4.21).
Thus, (3.11) and (3.12) together imply that for every.
The definition, the above relation, and (3.67) together imply (3.70).
Does the literature taken together imply the existence of the so-called natural resource curse?
