Sentence examples similar to today's concurring from inspiring English sources

As a part of today's announcement, Concur also revealed that it has invested $2 million in Evature, a company whose "Expert Virtual Agent" (EVA) offers natural-language search for online travel.

Today's anti-capitalists concur with Marx, claiming in effect that human ability should be enslaved to need, as if need creates a mortgage that the able must pay.

Justice Alito's concurring opinion in last week's case is particularly striking.

Today's neo-Paleyans must also concur with Paley that the watch's delicate functionality could not be the product of chance, inherent "principles of order," or laws of matter, nor merely an illusion of design.

Instead, I lived non-stop with the iPad, using the WordPress app to edit a typo in last week's column, the Concur app to make a meaningless dent in my expenses backlog, and doing amazing work at salesforce.com throughout the rest of my waking hours.

See Thomas v. Board of Education, Granville Central School Dist., 607 F.2d 1043, 1057 (CA2 1979) (Newman, J., concurring in result) ("[S]chool officials... do [not] have limitless discretion to apply their own notions of indecency. Courts have a First [p690] Amendment responsibility to insure that robust rhetoric... is not suppressed by prudish failures to distinguish the vigorous from the vulgar").

Felix G. Rohatyn, a senior adviser at Lehman Brothers and another architect of the city's 1970s rescue, concurred.

The robot really opened up art for me, and Ofsted's report today seems to concur.

Accord, Christensen v. Harris County, 529 U. S. 576, 590, n. (2000) (Scalia, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment) ("The implausibility of Congress's leaving a highly significant issue unaddressed (and thus 'delegating' its resolution to the administering agency) is assuredly one of the factors to be considered in determining whether there is ambiguity" (emphasis deleted)).

I adhere to my view that "a method of execution violates the Eighth Amendment only if it is deliberately designed to inflict pain". Baze v. Rees, 553 U. S. 35, 94 20088) (opinion concurring in judgment); ante, at 14.

Welfare Rights Organization, 426 U. S. 26, n. 6 (1976) (Brennan, J., concurring in judgment).