Sentence examples for to whose preferences from inspiring English sources

Should we go beyond QALY?), consideration is given to: whose preferences should be elicited within a trial (patients with different experience of the service vs. overall sample of trial participants), and when (whilst still receiving the intervention or afterwards)?

While respondent age was not observed to affect priority choices, BMI was perhaps unsurprisingly associated with preference class membership, reaffirming the need to give careful consideration to whose preferences are sought to inform priority decisions the public or individuals with some direct or indirect experience of the condition.

Each family member can have a personalized screen, and will not have to sign in — the higher-end Panasonic TVs will have a built-in camera that will use face recognition to determine whose preferences to display.

Beegle et al. (2001) consider the ownership of assets/share of household assets as indicator of economic power while Friedberg and Webb (2006) use information about who has the final say in household decisions to reveal whose preferences are reflected.

On this model, "paternalism" may be defined as the intentional overriding of one person's known preferences or choices by another person, where the person who overrides justifies the action by the goal of substantially benefiting or avoiding harm to the person whose preferences or choices are overridden.

How else does one justify the provision of all benefits commensurate with lawful marriage to loving couples with dissimilar genitalia, while denying it to those whose preference in partnership is those of their own gender?

However, Young, one of the few pundits who correctly called the shock state election loss by the Newman government last year, says the Coalition is repeating the mistake of appearing to shun minor parties whose preferences it needs to prevail with a primary vote at about 41%.

Structural perspectives are valuable insofar as they set the stage for examining the role of partisan actors who incarnate social and territorial cleavages and take the decision to decentralize power and whose preferences are therefore central to understanding the dynamics of decentralization.

Notice that, as the paradox of voting in Section 1 shows, these two conditions U and SO by themselves already rule out aggregating preferences by pairwise majority decision, if there are at least three alternatives to choose between, and three people whose preferences are to be taken into account.

-- and whose preferences to follow.

Audiologists in Portugal had significantly greater preference for patient-centredness when compared to audiologists in India and Iran whose preferences did not differ much.