We will refer to this methodology as "SRT" test.
Despite the sort-of fakeness to this methodology, I hate to say it, but it's working.
In the following, we will refer to this methodology as "key-word" test.
According to this methodology, the development cycle comprises three distinct phases: concept development, detailed design and hardware test.
Central to this methodology is the assumption that the current wetlands are fragments of the larger past wetland.
Two industrial applications are detailed to emphasize the benefits related to this methodology.
An overall methodology is presented; central to this methodology is Jens Rasmussen's abstraction-aggregation hierarchy.
It is also true that the rigorous argumentation, analysis of language, and use of symbolic logic often constitute obstacles for outsiders to this methodology.
Suggested extensions and modifications to this methodology may prove handy in making 3D similarity a more tractable tool for use on large conformer databases.
One objection that may be raised to this methodology is the lack of inclusion regarding partially failed, de-rated, or grey states.
We refer to this methodology as the "bottom-up" approach because it proceeds from the smallest length scales.
