Suggestions(2)
Exact(13)
It remains to prove the statement concerning uniqueness of.
In remains to prove the statement about uniqueness.
Without loss of generality it is enough to prove the statement for n=0.
It is therefore sufficient to prove the statement of the lemma for Y of this form.
The category (C_cdot ^{pf} k)) is self-dual, and the duality interchanges fibrations and confibrations, so that it suffices to prove the statement for fibration.
Since by Proposition 1, we have shown that BPeMRF behaves as BP, it suffices to prove the statement of Proposition 2 for the BP algorithm.
Similar(47)
In other words, the government not only needs to prove the statements were wrong, but that the executives knew them to be wrong.
Now we are in a position to prove the statements formulated in Sections 2 and 3. Proof of Corollary 2.1.
To prove the statements, the molecules were clustered according to their scaffold id from the original publication and the activities were visualized as a heat map, see Fig. 9.
To this end, we have to prove the following statement.
We have only to prove the last statement.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com