Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(21)
Regardless of the associated p-value, ESs between 0.50 and 0.80 were considered to be in the medium to large range and therefore worthy of provisional discussion.
Consistent with the conceptualization of disease-specific symptoms as causal indicators of generic HRQOL, the majority of intercorrelations among the Neuromuscular Module Scales and the Generic Core Scales were in the medium to large range, supporting construct validity.
Importantly, the effect sizes for the advantage of exercise over rest remained in the medium to large range (i.e., partial η2 > .07) after controlling for the effects of gender, anxiety sensitivity, and negative affectivity.
Different combinations of fluids, including ionic liquids, glycerol and silicon oils, lead to large range of continuous fluid viscosity (μc=0.5 1000 mPas) and viscosity ratio (λ=1/270 120), allowing for comprehensive investigation on how fluid viscosity affects droplet formation.
Nevertheless, effect sizes for these comparisons were in the moderate to large range (d = 0.57 and 0.68 respectively).
These correlations were generally in the moderate to large range.
Similar(39)
Admission practices in different countries may also lead to large ranges in mortality.
The magnitude of effect size estimates was moderate to large, ranging from 0.58 (satisfaction with undesirable side effects) to 0.91 (overall satisfaction score).
The initial idea of a simple adjustment factor was discarded due to large ranges and intra-patient proliferation differences in both directions.
The effect sizes for these QoL domains in the treatment-naïve group were about half of those obtained for symptom control (FBB-ADHD); however, they were still in the moderate-to-large range.
The sample size for this feasibility study was derived using assumed differences between the control and each experimental arm of 0.48 (effect sizes in the "medium-to-large range" as defined by Cohen 33) using a 2-sided alpha of.05 and a power of 0.80.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com