I am writing to confirm that "to incur harm" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
You can use it in any situation when you want to express that someone has suffered damage or negative consequences as a result of their actions or decisions. Here is an example sentence: "He knew that his reckless behavior would inevitably lead to him incurring harm, but he continued to take risks anyway."
If we opt for the second solution we appear to run head on into the problem of the subject, for assuming that we do not exist after we are alive, no one is left to incur harm.
Such recommendations have been derived from evaluation of specific patient populations, and it is important to recognize that engaging a strict guideline approach has the potential to incur harm if the clinician fails to provide a comprehensive review of the patient's physiological status in determining the benefit and risks of transfusion.
Future quality measures should focus on individual risk/benefit to ensure that patients who are likely to benefit from a service receive it (regardless of age), and that those who are likely to incur harm are spared unnecessary and costly care.
Two cases in New Jersey and New York, Safer v. Peck and Tenuto v. Lederle Laboratories, extend the duty to warn immediate family members of risky hereditary conditions and services like vaccinations which may incur harm to unimmunized family members (90 NY2d 606).
Detection and prevention of repackaging is also beneficial for original developer/publisher as they do not incur harm to revenue or reputation.
The termination thesis poses a significant obstacle to the subsequentist view that, due to death and posthumous events, we may incur harm while we are dead, for it implies that death annihilates its victims, from which it appears to follow that there is no subject who is a candidate for further harm.
Is it plausible to argue that dead people can still incur harm?
"Those practices do incur harm," he said, and should come under the scrutiny of the Fish and Wildlife Service.
At those times when (living) people are responsive, they may incur harm; because shoes are never responsive, they can never incur harm.
Nevertheless, concurrentists could be correct about when death harms us even if they are wrong about the time we incur harm from posthumous events.
This puzzle is the problem of locating the time during which we incur harm for which death and posthumous events are responsible.
