to house

USAGE SUMMARY

'to house' is not a grammatically correct sentence in written English.
To use it, you could rephrase as 'housing' or 'to provide housing'. Example sentence: The government has committed to providing housing to those in need.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

42 human-written examples

JoHouseran's acclaimed memoir Jolly Lad, based on his long-running column MENK for VICE is available from Stoange Attractor Presse Attractor Press.

Vice

"The city is pretending to house people".

The New York Times

The group rotates from house to house.

The New Yorker

He has 21 children to house.

Independent

We go to house of Tony Benn?

Independent

The building happens to house P.C Richards.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

18 human-written examples

House-to-house searches accelerated.

The New York Times

The Americans staged house-to-house searches.

The New York Times

House-to-house searches and arrests continue.

The New Yorker

House-to-house collection of certain objects only.

International Journal of Industrial Chemistry

The campaigns include house-to-house visits.

Unicef

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for grammatical precision, consider using "housing" or "to provide housing" instead of "to house". This ensures clarity and aligns with standard English usage.

Common error

Avoid using "to house" as a standalone phrase when a noun or object is expected. For example, instead of saying "The plan is to house", specify "The plan is "to provide housing" for the refugees."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to house" functions as an infinitive, often intended to express the action of providing shelter or accommodation. As noted by Ludwig AI, it's not always grammatically correct as a standalone phrase and often needs completion. Examples show its use in contexts like "The building happens to house P.C Richards" and "But we have to house these students."

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

33%

Wiki

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Reference

4%

Social Media

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while "to house" is commonly used to express the idea of providing shelter or accommodation, it's grammatically questionable as a standalone phrase. Ludwig AI indicates that it's often better to use alternatives like "housing" or "to provide housing", especially in formal contexts. Its usage spans across various domains, including news, science, and general content, but a more precise and grammatically sound alternative is advisable in professional writing. Always consider the context to ensure the clearest and most accurate expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to provide housing for

Adds specificity by explicitly stating the provision of housing.

housing

Expresses the same meaning without the infinitive form

to accommodate

A more general term indicating provision of lodging or space.

to harbor

Implies providing refuge or shelter, sometimes with a sense of secrecy or protection.

to shelter

Focuses on protecting from the elements or danger.

to give lodging to

A more formal and explicit way of saying to provide a place to stay.

to put up

An informal way to say to provide temporary accommodation.

to take in

Suggests welcoming someone into your home or care.

to store

Focuses on keeping items in a specific location.

to contain

Emphasizes holding something within a structure.

FAQs

How can I use "to house" correctly in a sentence?

While "to house" is often used, it's grammatically more precise to use "housing" or "to provide housing". For example, instead of "the goal is to house", say "the goal is "to provide housing"".

What's a more formal alternative to "to house"?

A more formal alternative is "to accommodate". This implies providing lodging or space in a more official context.

When is it appropriate to use "to house"?

While commonly used, "to house" might be considered less formal. In official or academic writing, consider using "to provide housing for" or "housing" for better clarity and adherence to grammatical norms.

Is there a difference between "to house" and "to shelter"?

Yes, "to shelter" focuses more on providing protection from the elements or danger, while "to house", though less precise, generally refers to providing a place to live or stay. In more formal contexts, "to provide housing" may be better than "to house".