One argument to explain this discrepancy is that the Oligocene volcanic units are strongly welded ignimbrites giving rise to the high model density values.
We give arguments to explain this fact.
A simple lipophilicity argument is obviously unable to explain this observation.
Several arguments have been proposed to explain this controversial situation.
To explain the argument is to reveal its dangers.
This means that clinical teachers need to explain the arguments underlying their treatment choice explicitly to their students [ 18, 19].
On Mashable, Chris Heald analyzed the legislation in detail to explain the arguments against it.
The proof goes via approximation and we confine ourselves to explain the arguments for the inequality in display (192), those for the other ones being completely analogous.
As Wilkins explains, this argument seems designed to benefit a certain group.
To explain and support this argument further we come back to our most important and maybe most obvious finding that quality of an assessment programme can only be judged in light of its purpose.
Here we try to explain the varying arguments this situation throws up and examine how it might end.
