Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(1)
The only analysis that could be undertaken was to examine a difference between groups regarding function at 2 and 5 years, which again demonstrated no difference.
Similar(59)
The aims of the present study were to examine (a) differences between FSOs and FNSOs in background characteristics and the level of general recidivism, (b) differences between FSOs and FNSOs in the prevalence and impact of both risk and protective factors, and (c) the unique contribution of the risk/protective domains to the prediction of recidivism in both FSOs and FNSOs.
Furthermore, in order to thoroughly examine a difference in effect between two interventions head-to-head comparisons are needed.
This was to examine a possible difference in neck proprioceptive responses and their interaction with vestibular responses.
An independent T-test was used to examine a possible difference in mean follow-up time between the diabetes and the reference group.
Given the low incidence of acute dialysis (about 0.45% in all types of major surgery [ 1- 3]), a very large trial (over 150,000 patients) would be needed to examine a meaningful difference with this as a primary outcome.
To examine a possible difference in neck velocity responses and in their interaction with vestibular responses, in this study we classified a total of 66 FEF pursuit neurons as 1 of the 2 groups (Fig. 1 C, D, see Recording procedures).
To examine a possible methylation difference between MNC subpopulations, CD34+ and CD34– fractions were also analysed separately.
However, our study was not designed to have and did not have sufficient numbers to examine a potential black/white difference.
To examine such a difference in differences (or the corresponding ratio of odds ratios), we fitted a logistic regression model with a novel case-centered specification.
However, when we fitted a longitudinal model to examine whether a difference existed between weeks 16 and 20 for each of the symptoms, no statistically significant differences were identified.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com