Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
A donor gets three tries to donate a sample within our sperm count range.
Regarding employment characteristics, more women who began to work in the 1950s tended to donate a sample (57%) compared to women who began work after 1970 (43%).
Asking research participants to donate a sample or data for each research question when new research questions could potentially be answered by already existing samples and data is unnecessary duplication and unfair.
Interestingly, women who reported a first degree relative with breast cancer were less inclined to donate a sample (44% vs. 53% of those with no family breast cancer history).
We focused on a random subsample of 4,498 of the women who were contacted to donate a sample of blood, and therefore were subject to a second data collection within a relatively short time span.
Similar(7)
In an extensive review of the topic, Wendler found more than 80%% of respondents in the vast majority of studies reviewed reported that they would consent to donating a sample for use in a biobank [ 7].
Height and weight were measured using standardized protocols, and the women were asked to donate a urine sample (~ 20 mL) and blood samples (4 mL for separation of plasma).
The women who were willing to donate a blood sample for research were informed that the sample in the future could be used for research.
At that time point 277 mothers had been asked to donate a blood sample from their infants and the participation rate in the blood sampling of the infants was thus 32%.
Specifically, the group of women who donated blood within a year of their questionnaire and supplied information on their anthropometric measurements (n=1,723) were compared with those in the eligible cohort, who were willing to donate a blood sample, minus the random subsample (n=91,828) using chi-square tests of independence and two sample t-tests.
During the Army interview the cohort members were invited to donate a blood sample.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com