Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
The power in these comparisons to detect a medium effect was middling (.58 and.56, respectively).
In this analysis, the power to detect a "medium" effect (d = 0.5) in the difference limens is approximately 81% [36].
We estimated a priori that a total sample size of 80 would provide 94% power to detect a large effect (d = .8) and 60% power to detect a medium effect (d = .5).5
The sample size was calculated to detect a medium effect size, if such an effect existed.
This part of the study was adequately powered to detect a medium ES.
The present study has sufficient power to detect a medium effect size of f = 0.25.
Finally, this study is powered to detect a medium effect size.
This effective sample size is sufficiently large to detect a medium effect size.
In our calculations, our power to detect a medium effect size (0.40) was less than 40%.
This powerful test of mediation requires a sample of 71 participants to detect a medium effect [ 60].
First, for continuous scores, 64 participants in each group will allow to detect a medium effect size (ES=0.5) [ 75].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com