Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

to define with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "to define with" is not standard in written English and may lead to confusion.
It could be used in contexts where you are specifying the means or method of defining something, but it is not commonly used. Example: "I need to define with clarity the terms of our agreement."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

44 human-written examples

Gender itself is difficult to define, with a mix of social, medical and individual interpretations.

News & Media

The Guardian

Rule 404 employs terms that are difficult to define with precision.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"I want to define with Algeria a strategic partnership on an equal-to-equal basis.

News & Media

The New York Times

The several councils mentioned in Talmudic literature are equally difficult to define with any precision.

"He has symptoms, and really, they're hard to define with him," said Glen Sather, the Rangers' president and general manager.

To his credit, he circles his subject in eloquent detail without ever attempting to define with any finality what lies at the heart of Morrison's songwriting.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

14 human-written examples

But I don't want to define myself with silly stunts, hugging huskies or sledging with hoodies or anything like that.

News & Media

The Guardian

The optimal cutoff values were SI ≥ 6 to define tumors with high GOLPH3 expression, and SI ≤4 to define tumors with low GOLPH3 expression.

Science

BMC Cancer

Sometimes with work, it's this thing of: what is going to define me with my career, what am I searching for?

But unlike the voluble Sharpton or the squarish Joe Lieberman, Edwards has struggled to define himself with voters.

We know that Malcolm Turnbull and Bill Shorten are leaders struggling to define themselves with a cynical public.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, replace "to define with" with more precise alternatives like "to specify using" or "to clarify using". These alternatives enhance readability and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Do not use "to define with" when a simpler, more direct phrasing can express your intended meaning. Overcomplicating your sentence can obscure your message and reduce the impact of your writing.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

3.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to define with" functions as an infinitive phrase followed by a preposition. While it appears in various contexts, Ludwig AI suggests that it's not the most grammatically sound phrasing, and clearer alternatives exist.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "to define with" appears across various sources, Ludwig highlights that it is not considered the most grammatically sound. This phrase, which combines an infinitive with a preposition, aims to express the use of a specific method or tool in the act of defining. Its usage spans from scientific literature to news media, but its awkward construction can lead to ambiguity. For clearer and more effective communication, alternatives like "to specify using" or "to clarify using" are recommended. When choosing a replacement, consider the context and intended level of formality to ensure your writing is precise and easily understood.

More alternative expressions(6)

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

FAQs

How can I rephrase "to define with" for better clarity?

Consider using alternatives such as "to specify using" or "to clarify using" for improved precision. The best choice depends on the specific context and intended meaning.

Is "to define with" grammatically correct?

While used in some contexts, "to define with" is not the most grammatically sound phrasing. Opting for alternatives like "to define using" often results in clearer and more conventional English.

What's a more formal alternative to "to define with"?

For a more formal tone, try "to delineate by means of" or "to ascertain via", depending on the nuances you wish to convey. These options lend a sense of precision and thoroughness.

How does the meaning change when using "to define with" versus "to define using"?

"To define with" can sound slightly awkward and less direct. "To define using" is generally clearer and more widely accepted, directly indicating that something is used in the process of defining.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

3.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: