to conduct with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'to conduct with' is incorrect and not usable in written English.
You could use 'to conduct' or 'to engage with.' For example: The manager asked the staff to conduct a survey, or The team agreed to engage with the stakeholders.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

41 human-written examples

In 2001, she was invited to conduct, with Glyndebourne's touring company.

The New York Times

Economics is not physics, and experiments are impossible to conduct with enough control to consistently give us predictable results.

The New York Times

To the Bush administration, the interviews it wants to conduct with about 5,000 Middle Eastern men will generally be nothing more than relaxed chats.

The New York Times

As Mr. Shicoff tugged and pulled at the vocal lines, Mr. Ozawa tried to conduct with exactingly cued increments, which made the musicians hesitant and caused ensemble problems.

The New York Times - Arts

It is exactly the kind of research that Ms. Hoffman would have loved to conduct with the corporations she has worked with over the years.

The New York Times

The American investigation, a standard internal procedure, precedes a joint investigation that the military has agreed to conduct with the United Nations and the Afghan government.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

19 human-written examples

The Ibn Khaldun Fellowship program allows Saudi Arabian women with PhDs to conduct research with MIT faculty.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Mr. Obama plans to conduct negotiations with Mr. Medvedev on Monday and have breakfast with Mr. Putin on Tuesday.

The New York Times

With such a transformation comes the wisdom to conduct life with self- discipline or yama.

Huffington Post

The onus is on you to conduct yourself with decency.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Are there opportunities to conduct research with faculty?

Columbia University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "to conduct with" in formal writing. Instead, use "to conduct" followed by a clear explanation of the tools, methods, or partners involved in the activity.

Common error

The preposition "with" often creates redundancy or awkward phrasing when used after "conduct". Ensure that "conduct" is followed by a direct object or a more appropriate preposition if necessary. For example, use "conduct research" instead of "conduct with research".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to conduct with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. "Conduct" typically requires a direct object, indicating what is being carried out, rather than specifying instruments or participants with the preposition "with". Ludwig AI confirms the incorrectness.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "to conduct with" is considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. As Ludwig AI points out, the verb "conduct" usually needs a direct object specifying the activity being performed. Instead of using "to conduct with", it's better to use "to conduct" followed by a direct object and then clarify the means or participants involved. For example, "conduct the experiment with the team" is preferable. Because the phrase is non-standard, it is unsuitable for formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to conduct

Removes the preposition "with", focusing solely on performing the action of conducting.

to manage

Replaces "conduct" with "manage", implying a focus on overseeing and controlling activities.

to execute

Substitutes "conduct" with "execute", emphasizing the completion or carrying out of tasks.

to engage with

Replaces "conduct" with "engage", highlighting interaction and involvement.

to interact with

Emphasizes the reciprocal action of engaging or communicating with something or someone.

to perform

Substitutes "conduct" with "perform", focusing on the act of carrying out a task or activity.

to carry out

Replaces "conduct" with "carry out", stressing the execution and completion of a plan or task.

to implement

Focuses on putting a plan or system into effect, rather than just conducting an activity.

to administer

Implies the careful and organized management of something, especially a system or organization.

to handle

Suggests managing or dealing with something, often implying a degree of skill or care.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "conduct" in a sentence?

The verb "conduct" should typically be followed by a direct object, specifying what is being carried out. For example, "conduct an experiment", "conduct an interview", or "conduct a meeting" are correct usages.

What are some alternatives to "conduct"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "perform", "execute", "manage", or "carry out".

Is it grammatically correct to say "conduct with"?

No, it is generally not grammatically correct to use "conduct with". The verb "conduct" usually takes a direct object. For instance, one might say "conduct an orchestra" or "conduct a survey".

How can I rephrase a sentence that incorrectly uses "conduct with"?

Instead of saying "conduct with", rephrase the sentence to use a direct object after "conduct", or choose a different verb altogether. For example, instead of "conduct with the team", say "conduct the project with the team", or "collaborate with the team to conduct the project".