Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(26)
We perform comprehensive experiments to compare the performance between traditional Gaussian mixture model (GMM -HMMs and DNN-HMMs in three larGMM -HMMsge andessment datasets that contain various spoken tasks, classified broadly as constrained and open-ended three.
To compare the performance between methods, the relative error was computed.
The objective measurements, including spectral distortion and spectrogram, are used to compare the performance between original wideband speech at transmitting terminal and expanded wideband speech at receiving terminal.
In order to compare the performance between the proposed method and this method, we remove the motion blur by Fergus et al. [34] after applying the resolution enhancement.
In this paper, we combine a simple normalization mechanism to MOEA/D in order to compare the performance between MOEA/D with and without normalization.
To compare the performance between the SA BS and the conventional single antenna BS, two SA modems for the SA BS were used simultaneously.
Similar(34)
Finally, experimental results are analysed using an algorithm for the assessment of control loops to compare the performances between the centralized and the distributed implementations.
It suggests that a standard set of microRNAs would be needed to compare the performances between microRNA microarray platforms designed according to different miRBase versions.
To compare the performance difference between this new algorithm and the method in[4], we define a new measure of the separation called sep-degree.
The chi-squared test (STATA 9.0) was used to compare the performance characteristics between 2 independent journal subsets.
The purpose of this study is to improve the simulation capability of an integrated CA-Markov Chain (CA-MC) model using CA-MC based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and CA-MC based on Frequency Ratio (FR), both applied in Seremban, Malaysia, as well as to compare the performance and accuracy between the traditional and hybrid models.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com