Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
to clearly identify
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'to clearly identify' is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when one wants to make an effort to differentiate or explain something in an obvious manner. For example, "We need to clearly identify the goals and objectives of the project before beginning work."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Image processing methods were used to clearly identify the fringes.
Science
It's a perennial challenge to clearly identify who's speaking without lumbering the exchange with repetitious words.
News & Media
Augustine was also the first philosopher to clearly identify will as a distinct faculty of mind.
Encyclopedias
However, they were able to clearly identify only three as possible meteorites.
News & Media
We used both XRD characterization and SEM observation to clearly identify such a transformation process.
Science
Therefore, it is necessary to clearly identify damaged elements on grounding grid.
Direct comparison studies are required to clearly identify the major differences between the two dynamometer styles.
The results allow us to clearly identify the state-of-the-art methods.
Nevertheless, standard bioinformatic approaches fail to clearly identify a suitable template for molecular modeling.
Science
Animal models of ureteral obstruction have allowed to clearly identify the events leading to tubulointerstitial fibrosis.
Science
So I try to clearly identify who's in the "to" line and who's in the "cc" line.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "to clearly identify", ensure that the criteria for identification are well-defined and objective. This enhances the credibility and reliability of your analysis.
Common error
Avoid using "to clearly identify" when the identification process is subjective or lacks sufficient evidence. Overstating clarity can undermine the persuasive power of your argument.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "to clearly identify" functions as an infinitive of purpose, indicating the goal or intention behind an action. As Ludwig AI confirms, the expression is valid and common in the English language.
Frequent in
Science
57%
News & Media
29%
Academia
7%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
2%
Formal & Business
2%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "to clearly identify" is a versatile and frequently used phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and widespread application in English. Functioning as an infinitive of purpose, it serves to emphasize the importance of distinct recognition and specification, especially in formal and scientific settings. While alternatives like "to explicitly identify" or "to clearly pinpoint" exist, understanding the nuances of each can enhance the precision and effectiveness of your writing. Ensure that the criteria for identification are objective and well-defined to maintain credibility.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
to clearly pinpoint
Replaces "identify" with "pinpoint", suggesting a more precise and focused form of identification.
to clearly ascertain
Using "ascertain" instead of "identify" emphasizes the process of discovering or establishing something with certainty.
to explicitly identify
"Explicitly" adds a sense of directness and lack of ambiguity to the act of identifying.
to clearly determine
Switches from "identify" to "determine", focusing on the resolution of uncertainty or establishment of a fact.
to clearly specify
Replacing "identify" with "specify" suggests providing detailed and precise information about something.
to definitely identify
The adverb "definitely" emphasizes the certainty and conclusiveness of the identification.
to distinctly identify
Using "distinctly" highlights the separateness and clarity of the identification.
to clearly detect
Changes the verb to "detect", implying the discovery of something that was previously hidden or not obvious.
to categorically identify
"Categorically" adds a sense of unambiguous classification and placement into a specific category.
to unequivocally identify
Using "unequivocally" emphasizes that the identification is absolute and leaves no room for doubt.
FAQs
How can I use "to clearly identify" in a sentence?
Use "to clearly identify" when you want to emphasize the need to distinctly recognize or specify something. For example, "The purpose of the study is to clearly identify the factors contributing to climate change."
What are some alternatives to "to clearly identify"?
You can use alternatives like "to clearly pinpoint", "to explicitly identify", or "to clearly determine" depending on the context.
Is it redundant to use "clearly" with "identify"?
While "identify" inherently implies recognition, using "clearly" emphasizes the lack of ambiguity and the ease with which something can be recognized. It adds emphasis but can be redundant in some contexts.
What's the difference between "to clearly identify" and "to define"?
"To clearly identify" focuses on recognizing and distinguishing something, whereas "to define" involves providing a precise meaning or description. Identifying is about recognition, while defining is about explanation.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested