Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

to clearly identify

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'to clearly identify' is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when one wants to make an effort to differentiate or explain something in an obvious manner. For example, "We need to clearly identify the goals and objectives of the project before beginning work."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Image processing methods were used to clearly identify the fringes.

It's a perennial challenge to clearly identify who's speaking without lumbering the exchange with repetitious words.

Augustine was also the first philosopher to clearly identify will as a distinct faculty of mind.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

However, they were able to clearly identify only three as possible meteorites.

We used both XRD characterization and SEM observation to clearly identify such a transformation process.

Therefore, it is necessary to clearly identify damaged elements on grounding grid.

Direct comparison studies are required to clearly identify the major differences between the two dynamometer styles.

The results allow us to clearly identify the state-of-the-art methods.

Nevertheless, standard bioinformatic approaches fail to clearly identify a suitable template for molecular modeling.

Animal models of ureteral obstruction have allowed to clearly identify the events leading to tubulointerstitial fibrosis.

So I try to clearly identify who's in the "to" line and who's in the "cc" line.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "to clearly identify", ensure that the criteria for identification are well-defined and objective. This enhances the credibility and reliability of your analysis.

Common error

Avoid using "to clearly identify" when the identification process is subjective or lacks sufficient evidence. Overstating clarity can undermine the persuasive power of your argument.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to clearly identify" functions as an infinitive of purpose, indicating the goal or intention behind an action. As Ludwig AI confirms, the expression is valid and common in the English language.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

57%

News & Media

29%

Academia

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "to clearly identify" is a versatile and frequently used phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and widespread application in English. Functioning as an infinitive of purpose, it serves to emphasize the importance of distinct recognition and specification, especially in formal and scientific settings. While alternatives like "to explicitly identify" or "to clearly pinpoint" exist, understanding the nuances of each can enhance the precision and effectiveness of your writing. Ensure that the criteria for identification are objective and well-defined to maintain credibility.

FAQs

How can I use "to clearly identify" in a sentence?

Use "to clearly identify" when you want to emphasize the need to distinctly recognize or specify something. For example, "The purpose of the study is to clearly identify the factors contributing to climate change."

What are some alternatives to "to clearly identify"?

You can use alternatives like "to clearly pinpoint", "to explicitly identify", or "to clearly determine" depending on the context.

Is it redundant to use "clearly" with "identify"?

While "identify" inherently implies recognition, using "clearly" emphasizes the lack of ambiguity and the ease with which something can be recognized. It adds emphasis but can be redundant in some contexts.

What's the difference between "to clearly identify" and "to define"?

"To clearly identify" focuses on recognizing and distinguishing something, whereas "to define" involves providing a precise meaning or description. Identifying is about recognition, while defining is about explanation.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: