Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
to blame for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"to blame for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to someone or something as the cause of a problem or mistake. For example, "The mayor is to blame for the mistake in the city budget."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
To blame for Arizona's wildfires?
News & Media
Who's to blame for unhappiness?
Were hedge funds to blame for either?
News & Media
Is Microsoft to blame for high unemployment?
News & Media
And who is to blame for that?
News & Media
Who is to blame for all this?
News & Media
Who is to blame for this mess?
News & Media
Who was to blame for that?
News & Media
"I'm definitely to blame for that.
News & Media
Drug violence is to blame for narcocorridos".
News & Media
Who was to blame for this?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Be specific about what someone or something is "to blame for". Clear language avoids ambiguity and misinterpretation.
Common error
While "to blame for" is common, overuse in formal writing can sound accusatory. Opt for more neutral phrases like "responsible for" or "a contributing factor to" to maintain a professional tone.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "to blame for" functions primarily as a predicative adjective phrase that ascribes responsibility or fault. Ludwig's examples illustrate its use in identifying the cause of negative outcomes or problems.
Frequent in
News & Media
66%
Academia
10%
Formal & Business
6%
Less common in
Science
6%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "to blame for" is a common and grammatically sound way to assign responsibility or fault. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and wide applicability across various contexts. While most frequently found in News & Media, as confirmed by Ludwig, it's important to consider the tone and context when using it, especially in formal writing. Alternatives like ""responsible for"" can provide a more neutral approach. Always ensure you have credible evidence before assigning blame to avoid unsubstantiated accusations.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
responsible for
This phrase directly indicates who or what is accountable for something.
accountable for
Similar to "responsible for", emphasizing the obligation to answer for consequences.
at fault for
Indicates that someone or something is the cause of a problem or error.
culpable for
Suggests guilt or deserving of blame for a wrongdoing.
the cause of
Focuses on identifying the source or origin of an event or situation.
the reason for
Explains the grounds or justification for something happening.
liable for
Indicates legal responsibility for damage or harm.
the source of
Points to the origin or starting point of something.
answerable for
Implies a duty to explain or justify actions or outcomes.
in charge of
Highlights the person or entity with control and oversight.
FAQs
How can I use "to blame for" in a sentence?
Use "to blame for" to indicate who or what is responsible for something negative. For example, "The company's management is "responsible for" the recent financial losses".
What are some alternatives to "to blame for"?
Depending on the context, you can use phrases such as ""responsible for"", "accountable for", or "at fault for".
Is it correct to say "to be blamed for"?
While grammatically understandable, "to blame for" is more common and natural-sounding. "To be blamed for" is generally used in passive constructions.
What's the difference between "to blame for" and "because of"?
"To blame for" directly assigns responsibility, while "because of" simply indicates a cause-and-effect relationship without necessarily implying fault. For example, "The accident was because of the icy road" doesn't assign blame, whereas "The driver was to blame for the accident" does.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested