to be split

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "to be split" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that is intended to be divided or separated into parts. Example: "The profits from the project are to be split equally among all team members."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"The world seems to be split".

The New York Times

Are brokerage and research to be split?

The Economist

They hate to be split up.

The Guardian

That royalty was to be split between Pentagram and Lamar.

The Guardian - Tech

Even the American community is going to be split".

The New York Times - Science

Some officials appeared to be split even within themselves.

The New Yorker

Groups had to be split evenly between men and women.

The New York Times - Travel

The magnificent library would have to be split up.

The Guardian

These pairs of dancers proved to be split personalities.

The New York Times - Arts

Andhra Pradesh is soon to be split in two.

The Economist

The Zetas, too, are said to be split by factionalism.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing, consider the context to ensure the most appropriate synonym for "to be split" is used to convey the intended meaning. For example, "to be divided" is more general, while "to be allocated" implies a specific purpose.

Common error

While "to be split" is widely understood, in formal writing, consider using more precise alternatives like "to be allocated" or "to be partitioned" to enhance clarity and professionalism.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to be split" functions as an infinitive phrase, often acting as part of a verb phrase. It indicates a future action or intention related to dividing something. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

78%

Science

11%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Reference

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "to be split" is a grammatically sound and frequently used infinitive phrase that signifies a future division or sharing of something. Ludwig AI validates its correctness. Its usage spans from news and media to scientific and business contexts, reflecting its broad applicability. While generally neutral in tone, it is advisable to consider more formal synonyms like "to be divided" or "to be allocated" in professional settings. By understanding its nuances and appropriate contexts, writers can effectively use "to be split" to convey precise meanings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to be divided

Replaces "split" with a synonym, offering a more general term for separation.

to be partitioned

Suggests a more formal or structured division, often used in technical contexts.

to be separated

Highlights the act of setting things apart without necessarily implying equal portions.

to be shared

Implies distribution among multiple recipients rather than a strict division.

to be allocated

Focuses on assigning portions for specific purposes or recipients.

to be distributed

Emphasizes the act of spreading something out among a group or area.

to be halved

Specifically refers to dividing something into two equal parts.

to be segmented

Focuses on breaking something down into distinct, manageable units.

to be cleaved

Suggests a sharp or decisive separation, often used in scientific contexts.

to be bifurcated

Implies dividing into two branches or forks, a more formal term.

FAQs

How can I use "to be split" in a sentence?

You can use "to be split" to describe how something will be divided or shared, as in "The inheritance is to be split equally among the siblings".

What are some alternatives to "to be split"?

Alternatives include "to be divided", "to be shared", or "to be allocated", depending on the context.

Is "to be split" formal or informal?

"To be split" is generally neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts, though more formal alternatives may be preferred in academic or professional writing.

What's the difference between "to be split" and "to be divided"?

While both phrases are similar, "to be split" often implies a more even or equitable division, whereas "to be divided" is a more general term for separation into parts.