Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
to be review
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "to be review" is not correct or usable in written English.
To use a phrase similar to "to be review" in written English, you could say "to be reviewed." Example: The new policy must be reviewed by the executive board.
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Wiki
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
5 human-written examples
Another strong defender of the N.S.A., Speaker John A. Boehner, agreed that "there needs to be review, there ought to be review and it ought to be thorough," he said.
News & Media
Take a book for what it is rather than what you want it to be; review it rather than its author.
News & Media
On the other hand, respondents agreed that there needed to be review of certain types of research but not for all research.
Science
If you are eating a healthy diet, but still feel like you are not quite where you would like to be, review what you are consuming every day.
Wiki
There is only so many questions that can be on a quiz, because it's short, and most of it is going to be review for you.
Wiki
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
52 human-written examples
To be reviewed.
News & Media
That rise is now to be reviewed.
News & Media
The labelling is also to be reviewed.
News & Media
That process plainly has to be reviewed.
News & Media
Basic policies need to be reviewed.
News & Media
Eighteen remain to be reviewed.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use the correct form "to be reviewed" instead of the grammatically incorrect "to be review".
Common error
Avoid using the base form of the verb after "to be". Always use the past participle (reviewed) instead of the base form (review) to maintain grammatical correctness.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "to be review" incorrectly attempts to form a passive infinitive. The proper construction requires the past participle, resulting in "to be reviewed". This grammatical error is identified by Ludwig AI, which suggests correcting the phrase to maintain grammatical accuracy.
Frequent in
News & Media
40%
Wiki
20%
Science
20%
Less common in
Formal & Business
5%
Academia
5%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "to be review" is a grammatically incorrect construction. As highlighted by Ludwig AI, the correct form is "to be reviewed", which uses the past participle of the verb. This correction is crucial for maintaining grammatical accuracy and clarity in writing. While the phrase attempts to express the need for examination or assessment, its incorrect form undermines its effectiveness. The correct usage is suitable for various contexts, while "to be review" should be avoided in formal or professional settings.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
to be assessed
Replaces "review" with "assessed", changing the specific action while keeping the general meaning of evaluating something.
to be examined
Substitutes "review" with "examined", suggesting a more detailed and thorough inspection.
to be inspected
Replaces "review" with "inspected", implying a close and critical observation.
to be evaluated
Swaps "review" with "evaluated", emphasizing the determination of value or significance.
to be checked
Replaces "review" with "checked", indicating a verification process for accuracy or completeness.
needs review
Changes the construction to highlight necessity, altering the verb phrase to emphasize requirement.
requires evaluation
Shifts focus to the need for evaluation, modifying the action and emphasizing the importance of assessment.
subject to review
Highlights the conditional aspect of review, emphasizing that something will be reviewed under certain circumstances.
pending review
Indicates that the review process is upcoming or in progress, changing the timing and focus of the phrase.
under consideration
Implies a broader assessment or deliberation, moving beyond a simple review to a more comprehensive evaluation.
FAQs
How to properly use "to be" with "review"?
The correct phrase is "to be reviewed", using the past participle of the verb. For example, "The document needs "to be reviewed" by the manager".
What's wrong with saying "to be review"?
"To be review" is grammatically incorrect. The verb "to be" requires a past participle (reviewed) or an adjective. The correct form is ""to be reviewed"".
Are there alternatives to "to be reviewed"?
Yes, you can use phrases like "to be assessed", "to be evaluated", or "to be examined" depending on the context. Each of these offers a slightly different nuance but maintains grammatical correctness.
Is "to be review" ever correct in English?
No, "to be review" is not considered correct in standard English. The correct form is always ""to be reviewed"". Using "to be review" is a common grammatical error.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested