to be requirement

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "to be requirement" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "to be a requirement"? If this is the case, you can use it when discussing something that is necessary or mandatory in a particular context. Example: "For this job, having a degree in engineering is to be a requirement for all applicants."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The Core Competencies are not intended to be requirements, burdens, or limitations.

Columbia University

Alex Lancaster: No excuse from England now that Estonia are down to 10. 3-0 is requirement.

BBC

It's going to be a requirement.

The New Yorker

Musical instruction used to be a requirement for budding composers.

The New York Times - Tech

That was never going to be the requirement here.

Independent

To coach in this sport of fawned-over soloists, that would have to be a requirement.

The New York Times

And, he added, there appeared to be no requirement for developing countries to limit future emissions.

The New York Times

This is likely to be a requirement under the care bill when it comes into force.

The Guardian

Unique and viral storytelling continues to be a requirement.

Forbes

But this doesn't need to be a requirement for the job.

Forbes

There does not appear to be any requirement that the payment for coverage be disclosed.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use a determiner (a, the, etc.) or another modifier before "requirement" to make the phrase grammatically correct. For example, use "to be a requirement" or "to be one requirement".

Common error

Avoid using "to be requirement" without an article or possessive pronoun. This omission results in ungrammatical phrasing. Always include "a", "the", "one", or another suitable modifier to ensure grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to be requirement" is grammatically incorrect. It aims to express necessity or obligation, but lacks the necessary grammatical structure, specifically a determiner before the noun. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is not correct.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "to be requirement" is grammatically incorrect due to the missing article or determiner before the noun "requirement". As Ludwig AI highlights, this phrase is not a recognized construction in English. To express the intended meaning of necessity or obligation, it is essential to use a grammatically correct alternative such as "to be a requirement", "must be a requirement", or "should be a requirement". Always ensure that a determiner (a, the, one, etc.) precedes "requirement" to avoid grammatical errors and ensure clarity. The correct phrase could be employed across a range of contexts, from formal business settings to casual conversation, depending on the specific meaning and intended audience.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to be mandatory

Substitutes "requirement" with "mandatory", emphasizing the obligatory nature of something.

to be a necessity

Replaces "requirement" with "necessity", offering a slightly different nuance of essentiality while maintaining grammatical correctness.

to be obligatory

Uses "obligatory" instead of "requirement", underlining the binding nature of something.

to be essential

Replaces "requirement" with "essential", focusing on the fundamental importance of something.

to be imperative

Replaces "requirement" with "imperative", stressing the critical and urgent nature of something.

to be a prerequisite

Replaces "requirement" with "prerequisite", highlighting something that is required before something else can happen.

to be a condition

Uses "condition" instead of "requirement", indicating something that must be met or fulfilled.

to be a must

Replaces "requirement" with the more informal "must", indicating something that is absolutely necessary.

to be a stipulation

Substitutes "requirement" with "stipulation", suggesting a specific demand or condition.

to be de rigueur

Substitutes "requirement" with the French phrase "de rigueur", implying something is expected or fashionable.

FAQs

What's grammatically wrong with "to be requirement"?

The phrase "to be requirement" lacks a determiner (like 'a' or 'the') before the noun "requirement", making it grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "to be a requirement."

How can I correctly use the idea of "to be requirement" in a sentence?

Instead of "to be requirement", use "to be a requirement", "must be a requirement" or "should be a requirement" depending on the context.

What can I say instead of "to be requirement"?

Consider using phrases like "to be mandatory", "to be essential", or "to be necessary" to express the same idea with better grammar.

Is "to be requirement" ever correct?

No, "to be requirement" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It always requires a determiner or modifier before "requirement", such as "a", "the", "one", etc.