to be establish

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "to be establish" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "to be established"? You can use "to be established" when referring to the process of something being set up, created, or recognized. Example: "The new guidelines are expected to be established by the end of the month."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Wiki

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

However, (Danneels and Kleinschmidtb, 2001) says that conceptualization of product innovativeness has yet to be establish empirically.

Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research

It remains to be establish whether caveolae could act as inhibitors or activators of IGF-IR signaling [8].

Plosone

How long does it need to be? Establish your deadline.

WikiHow

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

That has yet to be established.

The Economist

A Federal Civil Rights Commission is to be established.

The New Yorker

I wish for justice to be established.

The New York Times

How is democracy to be established?

The New York Times - Books

"But you have to be established first".

The New York Times

"But the link has to be established".

The New York Times

Tariffs have yet to be established.

The Guardian - Tech

"Sustainable security" is to be established nationwide by the summer of 2009.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the past participle form "established" when you intend to convey that something is in the process of being set up or confirmed. The correct phrase is "to be established".

Common error

Avoid using the base form of the verb after "to be". Remember that when using "to be" in the passive voice, you generally need the past participle (e.g., "established"), not the base form (e.g., "establish").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to be establish" attempts to function as part of an infinitive construction within a passive context. However, it's grammatically incorrect as it uses the base form of the verb "establish" instead of the past participle "established". Ludwig highlights the need for correction.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "to be establish" is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is "to be established". Ludwig AI points out that this error stems from using the base form of the verb instead of the past participle in a passive construction. Although examples of the incorrect phrase exist, they are infrequent and primarily found in contexts such as science, news and media, and wikis. To ensure grammatical correctness, always use "to be established" when referring to something in the process of being created or validated.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to be established

This is the grammatically correct form of the original phrase, using the past participle.

to be created

Focuses on the act of bringing something into existence.

to be set up

Implies arranging or organizing something.

to be determined

Emphasizes finding something out or deciding on something.

to be instituted

Suggests formally introducing a system or policy.

to be formed

Focuses on the process of something taking shape or being brought together.

to be developed

Highlights the gradual growth or improvement of something.

to be constructed

Implies building or assembling something systematically.

to be validated

Emphasizes the confirmation or proof of something's accuracy or validity.

to be ratified

Suggests formal approval or confirmation.

FAQs

How to use "to be established" in a sentence?

Use "to be established" when referring to something that is in the process of being set up, created, or confirmed. For example, "New safety protocols need "to be established" before the project can proceed."

What's the difference between "to be establish" and "to be established"?

"To be establish" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""to be established"", which uses the past participle and indicates a passive action—something being brought into existence or confirmed.

What can I say instead of "to be established"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "to be created", "to be set up", or "to be determined".

Is "to be establish" ever correct?

No, "to be establish" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct form is ""to be established"".