Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
to avoid lost
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "to avoid lost" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "to avoid loss"? You can use the corrected phrase when discussing strategies or actions taken to prevent losing something, whether it be money, time, or opportunities. Example: "We implemented new security measures to avoid loss during the transaction process."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
Academia
News & Media
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
7 human-written examples
We take only carry-on bags to avoid lost luggage.
News & Media
To avoid lost work, please do not make any changes to the site until this message is removed.
The discovery could lead to the development of drugs to maintain the circadian clock's natural speed thus, in theory, allowing the body to avoid lost sleep because of jet lag or shift work.
News & Media
It is imperative that students make sure their address in my.uchicago.edu is accurate to avoid lost checks.
Academia
However, from a conservative point of view, it is better to maintain wellbore pressure below FIP during drilling to avoid lost circulation.
Science
For the túngaras, such "irrational" behavior could be the result of females feeling pressure to make a decision quickly to avoid lost mating opportunities or predators like bats.
Science & Research
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
53 human-written examples
How to avoid losing our mental maps?
News & Media
To avoid losing her, he takes a sip — and more.
News & Media
Charles apparently would do anything to avoid losing.
News & Media
Retailers keep prices low across categories to avoid losing customers to competitors.
Academia
Be sure to save your changes often to avoid losing your work.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When aiming to express the intention of preventing something from being lost, ensure you follow the verb "avoid" with a gerund (verb ending in -ing) or rephrase the sentence for grammatical accuracy. For example, use "to avoid losing" instead of "to avoid lost".
Common error
A common mistake is using the past participle form of the verb (e.g., "lost") directly after "to avoid". Remember that "avoid" needs to be followed by a gerund or a noun. Instead of saying "to avoid lost", use "to avoid losing" or "to avoid loss".
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "to avoid lost" functions as an infinitive phrase intended to express purpose, specifically the intention to prevent something from being lost. However, it contains a grammatical error because the verb "avoid" requires a gerund (verb ending in -ing) or a noun phrase as its object. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically incorrect.
Frequent in
Science
33%
News & Media
33%
Academia
33%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "to avoid lost" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI suggests using "to avoid losing" or "to prevent loss" instead. Although examples exist in various contexts such as science, news, and academia, the grammatical error undermines its effectiveness. When writing, ensure that "avoid" is followed by a gerund (verb ending in -ing) or a noun. Pay attention to source quality as the usage is common across a range of sources, but the incorrect grammar affects its acceptability in formal writing. To enhance clarity and credibility, it's crucial to use grammatically correct alternatives.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
to prevent losing
Replaces "avoid" with "prevent" and corrects the grammatical structure following the verb.
in order to not lose
Emphasizes purpose with a different structure, focusing on negating the action of losing.
so as not to lose
Similar to "in order to not lose" but more formal.
with the aim of avoiding loss
Clearly states the aim and the action being avoided.
in an effort to not lose
Highlights the attempt to not lose something
to ensure no loss of
Shifts focus to ensuring the absence of loss, using a more formal tone.
to safeguard against loss
Highlights the protective measure taken against potential loss.
to circumvent losing
Focuses on finding a way around the situation that leads to losing.
for the purpose of preventing loss
Explicitly states the purpose with a focus on loss prevention.
to preclude the loss of
Uses a more formal word, "preclude", to mean prevent.
FAQs
What is the correct grammatical structure to use after "to avoid"?
The verb "avoid" should be followed by a gerund (verb ending in -ing). For example, the correct structure is "to avoid losing" rather than "to avoid lost".
Is it always wrong to say "to avoid lost"?
Yes, "to avoid lost" is grammatically incorrect. The correct usage is "to avoid losing" or "to avoid loss". You can also use alternatives like "to prevent losing".
What can I say instead of "to avoid lost"?
Instead of "to avoid lost", you can use alternatives such as "to avoid losing", "to prevent loss", or "in order to not lose".
How can I use "to avoid loss" in a sentence?
You can use "to avoid loss" in a sentence like: "We implemented new security measures "to prevent loss" during the transaction process".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested