When presented with the assist system drivers were less likely to accept a smaller gap, especially under low-visibility conditions.
Under this assumption, the probability that a randomly selected driver will accept a gap, P i (t), is given by the logit function as Eq. (5): P_{i} (t) = {1 mathord{left/ {vphantom {1 {[1 + exp ( - V_{i} )]}}} right.
For example, in Fig. 3, about 30%% of three-wheelers accept a gap of 3 s when the conflicting vehicles are cars; but the acceptance rate is only about 10%% when the conflicting vehicles are two-wheelers.
The union has offered to accept a reduction of $2.5 million, leaving a gap of $700,000.
All the aggressive drivers are found to have accepted a gap less than or equal to 6 s, whereas non-aggressive drivers accept gaps as high as 11 s.
Given values of 'G' and 'T c', the positive sign of the coefficient of forced entry 'F' shows that aggressive drivers have a larger probability of accepting a gap as compared to non-aggressive drivers.
The likelihood of accepting a gap increases with a decrease in clearing time because it becomes easier for drivers to take smaller gaps.
And people have much more difficulty accepting a gap in age when the older member of the couple is female.
It is assumed that, if the probability of accepting a gap is less than 0.5, the gap is rejected, and it is designated as 0. Similarly, if the probability is found to be greater than or equal to 0.5, the gap is accepted, and it is identified as 1.
If the driver accepts a gap, he/she can avoid any further delay at the intersection, whereas rejecting the gap will increase safety because taking a short gap can be risky.
