Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
This paper uses a range of Malawian data sources: a prospective study to explore time to uptake of contraception and a cross-sectional survey to assess whether sexually active postpartum women whose fecundity has returned use contraception, and whether abstaining/amenorrheic women report using contraception.
Time to uptake of a modern contraceptive since first sexual intercourse (sexual initiation) was used as dependent variable.
Nevertheless, we used alternatives that provided a reasonably approximate time to uptake of modern contraception among the married women.
However, the time to uptake in a specific guideline will vary according to the frequency with which the guidelines are produced or updated.
For respondents using modern contraceptives, the time to uptake of contraception was computed as the time difference between the year of uptake and age at sexual initiation.
Steps are required to minimise time to uptake in those families who do eventually catch-up, through the reduction of practical barriers.
Similar(51)
The half adsorption time is the time required to uptake half of the maximal amount of adsorbate at equilibrium.
It is obvious from the color-coding of the data points according to uptake time in Figs. 1 a and 2 a that this effect at most is responsible for a minor part of the scatter, driving LBR to somewhat higher values at late times (which on average correspond to lower SUVblood values, explaining the small but significant negative correlation of LBR and SUVblood in Fig. 2 a).
Cross-sectional estimates of contraceptive use do not provide understanding of time to postpartum uptake.
On the one hand, the time to maximum uptake was similar in both healthy and pathologic tissues.
In view of the possibility of a woman starting to use a modern contraceptive before marriage and being married at the time of the survey, it would have been better to have used the 'time to uptake of modern contraceptives after marriage' as the response variable for married women.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com