Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(46)
The performance of a device when compared with direct laryngoscopy relies on three main outcomes: overall success, 1st time success, and time to successful intubation.
To interpret changes in weaning success or time to successful weaning, future studies should include detailed information on sedation practices including the agents used, use of a sedation protocol (or lack of one) and scoring system, and whether or not daily interruptions in sedation were permitted.
Success - and time to successful placement - of small intestinal feeding tubes were not reported in all studies.
There was a statistically significant difference between the GlideScope and the MIL in the infant scenario in success of the first intubation attempt (96.5 vs. 60.7 %; p < 0.001), overall success rate (100 vs.83 %; p < 0.001), and time to successful intubation (34.6 vs.27.3 s; p = 0.023) (Table Supplementary data).
No statistically significant differences were found between groups at baseline in terms of overall success mean ratings, successful ventilation, LMA handling mean ratings and time to successful ventilation (Table 4).
Time to successful resolution of the question?
Similar(14)
We compared times to successful intubation, intubation success rates, and glottic visibility using a Cormack Lehane grade for Macintosh, Intubrite®, Coopdech®, and Copilot® laryngoscopes.
The times to successful intubation associated with use of the various devices are presented in Figure 3. Before analysis, the failures were removed for this outcome alone.
Time to first successful cannulation: This is defined as the time taken from the AVF surgery until the first successful attempt at access cannulation up to the 12 month visit (unchanged from the original protocol).
It takes time to grow successful innovations.
The primary end point was the time to achieve successful tracheal intubation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com