Sentence examples for time of the function from inspiring English sources

Barbier and Véron (1991) incorporated several of these elements in order to show an evolution in time of the function of free ports.

We define the regularization in time of the function (u_{varepsilon }) by (u_{varepsilon})_{nu} x,t)=nuint_{-infty}^{t} e^{nu(theta -t }bar{u}_{varepsilon } x,theta),mathrm{d}thetaquadmbox{for } nu inmathbb{N}, where (bar{u}_{varepsilon } x,theta)=u_{varepsilon } x,theta)) if (theta>0); (bar{u}_{varepsilon } x,theta)=0) if (thetaleq0).

Next an iterative process is used to improve on the first guess of the centre time of the function.

The mean change in BOLD intensity following exercise at the end of recovery was 0.17 ± 0.04 in the TS group and 0.14 ± 0.06 in the HC group; the mean response time of the function and the hypothesized washout of deoxyhemoglobin was 9.54 ± 4.11 s in the TS group and 8.13 ± 5.0 s in the HC group; and the mean half-time of recovery was 19.50 ± 6.37 s in the TS group, and 19.46 ± 7.31 in the HC group.

On the other hand, the execution time of the P2D function was much less than the SPD function.

The Laplace transform of the time derivative of the function f(t) is: {mathcal L}left{partial_{t}f(t)right} = sf s), (7).

"The autocorrelation function is calculated by the Stokes Einstein equation with the diffusion coefficient determined from the decay time of the autocorrelation function.

Here, is a real valued parameter that controls the release time of the ceiling function.

Right: Evolution on time of the distribution function with initial firing rate 2.31901.

Further, vibration suppression is discussed in the context of separation in space and time of the forcing function.

Characteristics of subjects at the time of the lung function test are shown in Table  1.