time has changed

USAGE SUMMARY

"time has changed" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it to describe how something has changed over a period of time, either in a literal way or figuratively. For example, "It's amazing how much time has changed the way people communicate."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

44 human-written examples

Time has changed him.

Independent

"Time has changed, and they have not".

The New York Times

Time has changed for me.

The Guardian

But time has changed all that.

Harvard University

So time has changed for me now.

The Guardian - Books

That time has changed going forward.

The New York Times - Travel

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

16 human-written examples

Naturally, times have changed.

Independent

Well, times have changed.

Forbes

How times have changed.

The New York Times

But times had changed.

The New Yorker

And times have changed.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing personal growth or altered perspectives, "time has changed" can effectively convey the influence of experience and maturation.

Common error

Avoid relying on "time has changed" as a generic statement without providing specific details about what has changed and how. Always offer context and elaboration to make the statement meaningful and impactful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "time has changed" primarily functions as a declarative statement, asserting that a transformation or evolution has occurred over a period. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is commonly used to express how something differs from the past. Examples from Ludwig show it used in news, academic, and scientific contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

25%

Science

16%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

3%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "time has changed" is a common and grammatically correct expression used to indicate a transformation or evolution over a period. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is widely accepted and suitable for various contexts, including news, academia, and general conversation. It effectively conveys a contrast between past and present states. While versatile, it's best used with specific context to avoid generic statements. Consider alternatives like "times have shifted" or "things are different now" to add nuance. The phrase's frequency and presence in authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian affirm its reliability and widespread use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

times have shifted

Focuses on a broader societal or cultural shift, rather than a personal change.

things are different now

Highlights a contrast between the present and the past, emphasizing the current state.

the world is not the same

Emphasizes a significant alteration in the global landscape or environment.

circumstances have evolved

Suggests a gradual and natural development of conditions over time.

the landscape has transformed

Implies a substantial change in a particular field or situation.

eras have transitioned

Highlights a change in distinct periods, suggesting a significant shift.

the climate has altered

Focuses specifically on changes in environment or atmosphere.

the paradigm has changed

Highlights a fundamental shift in thinking or approach.

the situation has developed

Implies that a particular set of events or circumstances has progressed and changed.

the rules are different now

Focuses specifically on altered regulations or guidelines.

FAQs

How can I use "time has changed" in a sentence?

You can use "time has changed" to indicate that something is different now compared to how it was in the past. For example, "Time has changed the way we communicate with each other."

What can I say instead of "time has changed"?

You can use alternatives such as "times have shifted", "things are different now", or "circumstances have evolved depending on the specific nuance you want to convey".

Is it appropriate to use "time has changed" in formal writing?

Yes, "time has changed" is appropriate for formal writing. While it's a common phrase, it's grammatically correct and can effectively convey a sense of transformation or evolution over time.

What’s the difference between "time has changed" and "times have changed"?

"Time has changed" emphasizes the abstract concept of time influencing something, while "times have changed" focuses on specific periods or eras undergoing transformation. The choice depends on whether you want to highlight the overall influence of time or specific shifts in historical periods.