Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Shoppers will need to wait longer to have their purchases processed, in addition to the wait time for standard ground shipping that's typically free -- unless, of course, they pay more to expedite shipping orders.
The total duration for group II was 31.84% higher than for group I. Regarding the reason for withdrawal of the CVC, predominant were suspected infection 77.8% of the time for standard CVCs, and 49.1% of the time for impregnated CVCs.
Similar(58)
There are significant differences in development time for standards involving different organisation types and countries.
Hence, the hypothesis for each test is that development time for standards involving one specific organisation type has a tendency to be longer than development time for standards involving a different organisation type.
For example, development time for standards involving larger enterprises (LE) vary between 47 and 5801 days with quite a large variability.
For example, development time for standards involving the United States (US) varies between 47 and 5801 days with quite a large variability.
Organisational involvement in relation to standard development time Development time for standards is diversified and spans from a couple of months to 15 years for different standards.
We also note a tendency for longer development time for standards that feature involvement from Norway (NO) for 12 out of 15 comparisons involving the country.
Data on development time for standards was collected through use of the W3C API11, where the date for the first release (typically a working draft) and the latest release (the recommendation) of a standard was collected and used for calculations.
It's way past time for standards of "good design" and "green design" to come together.
It's going to take a long time for standards of how much we pay for writing to become more unified, and for advertising to catch up with these new models.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com