"tight argument" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a convincing, well-structured argument. For example, "The lawyer presented a tight argument that swayed the judge in their favor."
The West cannot just stand by.A fine sentiment, but for once good intentions have apparently overcome Mr Wolf's instincts for logic and tight argument.
Marc Andreessen recently laid out an amazingly tight argument for why software will pretty much take over the world.
In the remarks that follow, I want to argue three points: 1) that Religious Experience is a remarkably tight argument, from beginning to end; 2) that the argument vindicates a methodological pluralism that was previously undervalued in the philosophical study of religion; and 3) that Religious Experience established a paradigm for the philosophical study of religion that remains the norm.
In a tight argument framed precisely in anatomical and morphological terms, he convincingly demonstrates similarities among the limbs of animals with different ways of life, proceeding pairwise, comparing human and bat, bat and mole, mole and human, and finally, human and horse.
It's a vacuum-packed anthology of tight arguments and shrewd observations.
I think it is a mistake to try and weave tight arguments about some of the Big Questions from the tangled threads of our experience.
I'm not saying these are the most air-tight arguments in the world; the point I'm making is that I seem mad for asking you to consider them.
When he presented these simple, air-tight arguments to the British people -- about choices they all faced in times of peace, as well as war--they responded with thousands of letters to him and huddled around their radios, thirsting to hear words that gave their embattled lives a sense of purpose and value.
When pushed by presenter Victoria Derbyshire to examine why Emwazi travelled to Syria killed for Isis, also known as the Islamic State, he emphasised the complexity of the attempting to fit radicalised individuals into a "tight intellectual" argument.
Like W., Burge even describes this as the "default" epistemic status, which need not be earned via some tight, philosophical argument.
For W., a subject does not need a tight philosophical argument to be entitled to her self-attributions; such entitlement is granted automatically (unless there is special reason to withhold it).
