Sentence examples for tier of performance from inspiring English sources
And unless the Jays are willing to deal talent either on the MLB team already or a guy like Jeff Hoffman, it's hard to see Toronto having the chips to do much but run with what they've got and add a starter in the Yovani Gallardo tier of performance, maybe.
He went on to describe that the PCs will be in the "high-to-mid tier" of performance, which I'm assuming will be something similar to Dell's XPS series of computers.
Although these quality indicators are monitored at the national level, they are not in the first tier of performance measures for which VA managers are held accountable.
These were selected to provide representation from each of the six geo-political zones, and to include three states from each tier of performance in implementing the earlier MSS programme (assessed based on their improvement in key performance indicators), as shown in Figure 1.
In this case, each of the world's countries is placed into one of several "tiers" of performance on the issues of child soldiering, child labor, forced prostitution, and so on.
For each of these indicators, IWA 11 2012 outlines "tiers of performance" that specify ranges for product performance based on laboratory testing.
To address this need, here we present an approach that extends the "tiers of performance" framework in IWA 11 2012 to provide quantitative guidance that integrates performance and use.
For those with rates already in the best tiers of performance, there can be attempts to improve even further by testing different or additional tools, but performance tracking will still be necessary.
Mt. Adams' schools rank in the third tier of academic performance within Washington's school accountability system.
Some elements of the earlier IPIF proposal, such as general practice quality measures, and tiered levels of performance, were not included in the SLM framework.
Scope scores revealed three discrete tiers of database performance: Tier 1 (82-77%), Tier 2 (73-65%) and Tier 3 56-411%) which were significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
