Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(22)
Thus, by induction, (4.7).
Thus by induction we obtain (2.32).
Thus, by induction, (8) holds for all n ∈ N ∪ { 0 }.
Thus by induction, it follows that, for all,,.
Thus by induction we get for all (2.65).
Thus, by induction, we know that inequality (3.5) holds for all.
Similar(38)
The lemma is thus proved by induction.
Thus, by mathematical induction we get (x_{n} in S_{0}) for all (ngeq0).
Thus, by mathematical induction, for every n ≥ 2, we deduce that H [ X ˜ n ( t + h ), X ˜ n ( t ) ] → 0. as h → 0 +.
Thus, by the induction hypothesis, f | [ a k + 1, a k ] ∘ f | [ a k, a k − 1 ] ∘ ⋯ ∘ f | [ a 1, a ] ∘ f | [ a, a − 1 ]. is strictly increasing, which shows that f | [ a k + 1, a k ] is strictly increasing.
We also have that (Theta,vdash ^mathtt{sats },Qleadsto,mathbb S _{0}), where (Q,=,S,[,overline{alpha },mapsto,overline{beta },],P_{0}), and thus, by the induction hypothesis, we have that (1) (Theta,Vdash,S^{prime },Q) holds for all (S^{prime }in mathbb S _{0}).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com