Sentence examples for thresholds of identity from inspiring English sources

To convert the training set from human to mouse (and fruit fly) thresholds of identity of 40% or 50% have been tested with no significant difference in performance (data not shown).

For this reason, similarity (identity based) networks using each of the seven Acinetobacter completely sequenced genome available in NCBI GenBank (A. baumannii 17978, A. baumannii AYE, A. baumannii SDF, A. baumannii AB0057, A. baumannii AB307, A. baumannii ACICU and A. baylyi ADP1) and the 29 plasmids were constructed at different thresholds of identity.

Using a threshold of identity of >85% in a 100 base window, 334 genes were present in all Cronobacter but absent or diverged in the four members of other genera (manuscript in preparation).

The threshold of identity >70% and coverage >50% were used to screen the output.

In addition, we also used a cutoff threshold of identity score between two ORFs (sequence identity >30% in amino acids), according to the study of Gu et al. (2002) [ 40].

We used a filtering criteria for this comparison using Blast where hits passing the threshold of identity > = 80%, alignment length > = 100 bps, and e-value < 1e-3 were considered as significant hits.

As the threshold of identity was lowered, these relationships were retained, with all four meningococcal genomes showing close relationships to the genome of isolate Z2491 and the N. lactamica and gonococcal genomes showing lower numbers of CDSs at each level of sequence identity, with all genomes converging at >70% identity for 1180 CDSs.

Even OTUs that were ubiquitous in oral or stool samples showed differentiation among samples at higher thresholds of sequence identity, suggesting that important differences were being masked at the 97% identity level.

We assessed ARGOT's performance using ROC plots to test the behavior and robustness of the method over different thresholds of sequence identity.

Next, the alignments from rps-BLAST are filtered out, based on the thresholds of percentage identity and percentage coverage (i.e., the alignment length as a function of the profile length) in order to eliminate random alignments (Figure 1-iv).

We retained only the alignments satisfying the thresholds of 95% identity and 90% coverage.