Sentence examples for threshold fitness from inspiring English sources

Objects that are not handled do not reach the threshold fitness for use.

We also explore whether the threshold fitness for use is defined differently for objects perceived to be of different value, and for different modes of use.

We also developed isochrones, plots linking points of equal expected 'lifetime', i.e. time until an object is expected to reach the state of threshold fitness for use.

Having defined the threshold fitness for use for paper-based documents, and the long-term planning horizon in which this might be acceptable, a dose response function is required that enables us to calculate the accumulation of tears and missing pieces as a consequence of frequency of use, as well as loss of strength as a consequence of natural ageing.

This is an interesting finding, as according to the threshold fitness for use, discussed in our previous paper [11] it is a large missing piece which makes a document unfit (unless a user has attached a strong historic value to the document, in which case such deterioration is generally viewed with more tolerance).

By combining the dose response function with the value-based parameter of threshold fitness, we will develop the damage function for historic paper and look at how it can be applied in the context of management of archival and library collections.

These are plots linking points of equal expected 'lifetime', i.e. time until an object is expected to reach the state of threshold fitness-for-use.

In CDAF technique, two thresholds "Fitness Threshold" and "Frequency Threshold" are used where each one of these could be determined either analytically or through some experimental procedures (if the ground truths are available).

This is a collection management decision, and in this calculation, one large missing piece per 100 sheets was taken as the threshold of fitness.

In this paper, we explore the threshold of fitness for use for archival and library paper documents used for display or reading in the context of access in reading rooms by the general public.

The minimum intensities in some included trials were lower than the aerobic intensity threshold for fitness improvements of 45% VO2R/60%HRmax proposed by Swain and Franklin [140], and consequently, it remains unclear at what point significant improvements in clinical outcome fail to occur.