Suggestions(5)
Exact(47)
Fig. 9 Bump widths for a Gaussian threshold distribution.
The one-step optimal input problem is solved both for equispaced and generic sensor threshold distribution.
Fig. 15 Probability distributions of bump widths for a Gaussian threshold distribution.
Fig. 12 Bump solutions as a function of ϵ for a Gaussian threshold distribution.
Fig. 17 Probability distributions of bump widths for a non-Gaussian threshold distribution.
During load, the fibers break quasi-statically according to a stress threshold distribution.
Similar(13)
In the first Wilson Cowan paper, it was assumed that these threshold distributions were either Poisson-like, or Gaussian.
Other parameter values are (kappa=5), (sigma^{2}=0.2), (L=100) Fig. 6 Mean speed versus ϵ for non-Gaussian threshold distributions.
To study the feasibility and test retest repeatability of a sensory threshold examination protocol (STEP) and report the quantitative sensory threshold distributions in healthy dogs.
Other parameter values are (sigma^{2}=1/kappa), (h_{0}=0.3), (epsilon =0.01), (L=100) Fig. 4 Instantaneous speed of a travelling front for non-Gaussian threshold distributions.
For all colony threshold distributions, the mean stimulus per site increases nonlinearly with the driving rate (Figure 10).
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com