For investigating the influence of IWE on the slope stability, we design three types of scenarios – minimal seepage, normal seepage and serious seepage – for the fluid solid coupling calculation.
Specifically, we simulate the following three types of scenarios: (a) Base model: In the base scenario, the expected probability5 of MTM adoption in country i is denoted as E[Pr MTM i |p i )].
Based on Börjeson et al.'s typology [10], we consider three types of scenarios: predictive, (forecasts and what-if scenarios), explorative (external and strategic scenarios), and normative scenarios (preserving or transformative (e.g. backcasting)) answering the respective questions: What will happen?
Collectively, we simulated three types of scenarios: (1) breathing and coughing, (2) breathing and sneezing, and (3) inhaling only through the nose and exhaling only from the mouth.
Three types of scenarios were simulated: (1) breathing and coughing, (2) breathing and sneezing, and (3) simply inhaling through the nose and exhaling from the mouth.
We conducted computational fluid dynamics simulations to investigate three types of scenarios: (1) nominal breathing (up to 20 breaths per minute) and coughing (20 times per hour); (2) nominal breathing and sneezing (4 times per hour); and (3) nominal breathing only.
We created three types of scenarios with different diagnoses: dementia, irreversible coma, and temporary illness.
We distinguish two types of scenario assumptions, namely assumptions on future developments and assumptions on systemic characteristics linking these.
Also, in the two types of scenario, the dialogues acquired using the simulation technique were shorter than those acquired with real users.
F-tests were employed to assess the significance of each of the predictor variables in five types of scenarios.
