The Harmony/ERT process focuses on three timescales: macrocycle, microcycle, and nanocycle.
Harmony exists at three timescales – project, iteration, and nancocycle and contains best practices at each level.
Unlike the MB solution in [13 15], our analysis shows that SB solution features are lost under the natural groupings to two timescales, supporting the preliminary conclusion that SB dynamics in system (1a)–(1g) requires at least three timescales.
Besides describing specific details of the SB solution features, we have also investigated whether this solution fundamentally involves three timescales.
It is at the temperature window where motions corresponding to all three timescales become operative that the protein becomes active.
3.2, we assess the importance of having three timescales in two natural ways, by adjusting the two slow variables to be either fast or superslow.
It is clearly seen that similar autocorrelation functions are found on the three timescales; similar results hold for X and V.
While the MB solution appears to involve at least three timescales based on its time course, we obtained a non-intuitive result in [15] that the core mechanism underlying the robust production of the MB pattern is in fact an interaction of only two timescales.
The same three timescales are already covered by today's dispatchable electricity generation facilities, which are able to follow the typical load variations on the intra-day, intra-week, and seasonal timescales.
We identified commonalities and differences between the mechanisms involved for the two models and argued that for both models, the sigh-like dynamics involves three timescales in an essential way.
We thus conclude that presence of three timescales is necessary for the emergence of the type of the SB solution we have studied, which differs from what was obtained in the pre-BötC MB model [15].
