Sentence examples for three parameters over from inspiring English sources

For the control, there was a homogenous decrease for all three parameters over the time course of the experiment.

Changes in the three parameters over the 3-year period were significantly different among the three groups (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2 A – C ). Participants in the STH group showed a greater weight loss than those in the DES and control groups (Fig. 2 D ).

Then the effects on enzyme activity at 30, 40 and 50 min after process initiation of varying each of two parameters over five levels were investigated.

For each of the four performance evaluators, we plotted the average and standard deviation values for the four parameters over the 100 iterations.

The trait dissection was performed identifying fourteen parameters over the combined mechanical-acoustic profile, ten of which were derived from the mechanical profile and four from the acoustic signature.

The predicted maximum response value for HPR was 8.77 mL H2/L h at an initial pH of 7.92, light intensity of 8.37 klux, and Mo concentration of 0.44 mg/L.> Response surface plots in three dimensions were developed based on Eq. (5) with one variable being kept constant at its optimal level, and varying the other two parameters over the experimental range (Fig.  3a c).

A negative correlation of these two parameters over the whole panel of tumor cells (i.e., the higher the expression rate of the transporter, the lower the toxicity of the compound) indicates that this compound is a substrate of the respective transporter.

A preliminary analysis showed that allowing for more than three parameters per equation over-fit the model more often than improving it, so we limited the number of parameters per linear equation to three.

The GSA results show that three parameters account for over 80percentt of the variance of the compactness distribution.

All three parameters are optimized numerically over the discrete set of values {0, 0.025, 0.05,…, 1.5}, to maximize the variance of expression intensity along the anterior posterior axis.

The sum of the corresponding products over these three parameters yielded 1b M R exp e c t e d   (D )   = ∑ i = 1 2 ∑ i = 1 2 ∑ i = 1 15 N i j k   (D )   ×   M R 0 i j k           MRexpected (D) = Nijk(D) × MR 0ijk(1b) as a function of the exposure D. The results are shown at Fig.3.