Sentence examples for three categorizations from inspiring English sources

Three categorizations are obtained from the results: no maladjustment (Tscore < 60), at risk of maladjustment (Tscore 60 69) and clinically significant maladjustment (Tscore > 69).

Three categorizations of sounds, based on sources, locations, and events, respectively, were proposed in order to explore the factors bearing on the distinctiveness of sounds and their effectiveness in conveying specific concepts.

Three categorizations of G are considered: binary, ordinal, and nominal.

We differentiated between three categorizations: not at all important; somewhat important; or important.

For SGA births, three categorizations were evaluated: births weighing <5th and <10th percentiles based on sex- and race-specific weight by gestational week norms from New Jersey and births weighing less <10th percentile based on sex-specific growth curves for California [ 4, 9].

The 5 most significantly enriched pathway terms and associated EASE scores under each of the three categorization systems are shown in Table 1.

For exposure type, we considered two categorizations of assaultive violence, Forced sexual activity and Nonsexual assault.

These four categorizations have been made with reference to the global financial crisis in the year 2007-2008.

Defining the equivalence of the hippocampus concept in these hierarchical alternatives effectively connects the two categorizations schemes at a common node.

Four categorizations of policy implementation: passive implementation, normal implementation (low speed), campaign-style implementation, and normal implementation (high speed)   Applicability of policy Low High Pressure for implementation Low Passive implementation Normal implementation (low speed) High Campaign-style implementation Normal implementation (high speed).

In [1], two categorizations of counter-forensic schemes (or attacks) are proposed: according to when, in the image acquisition chain, an attack takes place (integrated or post-processing, i.e., during or after the acquisition) and according to whether the countered forensic algorithm is known or unknown to the attacker (targeted or universal attack, respectively).