Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The 5 most significantly enriched pathway terms and associated EASE scores under each of the three categorization systems are shown in Table 1.
Similar(59)
Three categorizations are obtained from the results: no maladjustment (Tscore < 60), at risk of maladjustment (Tscore 60 69) and clinically significant maladjustment (Tscore > 69).
Three categorizations of sounds, based on sources, locations, and events, respectively, were proposed in order to explore the factors bearing on the distinctiveness of sounds and their effectiveness in conveying specific concepts.
Three categorizations of G are considered: binary, ordinal, and nominal.
We differentiated between three categorizations: not at all important; somewhat important; or important.
For SGA births, three categorizations were evaluated: births weighing <5th and <10th percentiles based on sex- and race-specific weight by gestational week norms from New Jersey and births weighing less <10th percentile based on sex-specific growth curves for California [ 4, 9].
Using the two categorization schemes, the six authors classified the list of 43 WePISMs.
For the Off-Peak scenario, the safety impacts obtained from the two categorization methods differ substantially.
For the Near-Peak scenario, the average relative safety benefits obtained from the two categorization methods are again similar.
In particular, we compare two categorization methods, namely an ad hoc method, and a near-optimal method.
The absolute difference between these two estimates is approximately 13% of the average of the estimates provided by the two categorization methods.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com