"thorough criticism" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when discussing a thorough or detailed analysis or evaluation of something. It can also refer to the practice of offering constructive feedback or criticism in a thorough and thoughtful manner. Example: "Before publishing the article, the editor requested a thorough criticism from the team of proofreaders." In this example, "thorough criticism" means a detailed review and feedback on the article.
Aftenposten remarked that Wibe's proposal was a "thorough criticism of Carl I. Hagen", among others in that it called for "a renewal of the party".
Arguably the most thorough criticism of Rainsy above calling him out for sexist jibes or alleged anti-Vietnamese slurs is the lack of substance to his key manifesto points, which sound like something out of a political fairy tale: a doubling of worker wages and real pensions.
We appreciate the reviewer's efforts and thorough criticism in reviewing our manuscript.
The problems related to placebo treatment are supported by thorough criticism of trialists and sponsoring companies performing placebo-controlled trials in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting [ 13, 14] – trials that all provided sufficient antiemetic rescue medications for all participants!
We greatly appreciate the thorough criticisms of Drs Gutierrez and Turkan, and the opportunity to answer them.
We also point the reader at this point to a thorough criticisms of the use of phylogenetic data to justify taxonomic inflation and its effect on conservation (Frankham et al. 2012; Zachos et al. 2013).
We are indeed thankful to the reviewer for the thorough constructive criticism of our manuscript.
A more thorough-going criticism of this property based approach to individuality insists that it conflates epistemological issues concerning how we distinguish objects, with ontological issues concerning the metaphysical basis of individuality.
Several researchers have attempted a thorough evaluation of criticisms and weaknesses of NVC and assessed significant challenges in its application.
The reviewers provided thorough and constructive criticisms helping us to improve the manuscript.
The result is an elegantly argued piece of cultural criticism, a thorough if sometimes dry work of social reportage that salvages the mundane, little-examined details of slacker life.
