this was verified by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "this was verified by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that a statement or fact has been confirmed or validated by a specific source or authority. Example: "The results of the experiment were significant, and this was verified by independent researchers."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This was verified by several members of the diplomatic corps.

The Economist

This was verified by it displaying useful information onto a Putty console.

Cornell University

This was verified by the relatives' independent rating and maintained at 3 month follow-up.

General Hospital Psychiatry

This was verified by a new shame measure that was created for this study.

Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

This was verified by X-ray microfluorescence and visualized by scanning electron microscopy measurements.

Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

This was verified by the removal of fish from the experimental ponds in October.

Fisheries Research

This was verified by SEM examinations on the surfaces of deformed specimens.

Acta Materialia

This was verified by measuring the thermal chemiluminescence of plasma treated flakes.

Composites Part B: Engineering

This was verified by moving the transmitter from one end of the Duffield hall to the other end of the hall.

Cornell University

This was verified by micro-Raman scattering studies as a function of light soaking of successively sensitized photoanodes.

Catalysis Today

This was verified by a simultaneous TG/reaction experiment showing that 1,3-butadiene was a precursor of green oil.

Catalysis Today

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "this was verified by", ensure the source of verification is clearly identified to enhance credibility. Be specific about who or what performed the verification.

Common error

Avoid stating "this was verified by" without specifying the agent or method of verification. This can weaken the claim's reliability. For example, instead of "This was verified by testing", specify "This was verified by testing with a standardized protocol".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "this was verified by" functions as a connector within a sentence, linking a statement to the method or entity that confirmed its accuracy. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a correct and usable construction.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

69%

Academia

16%

News & Media

5%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "this was verified by" is a valuable tool for enhancing the credibility of statements by indicating a specific source or method of confirmation. As Ludwig AI highlights, this passive construction is grammatically correct and most commonly found in scientific and academic writing. When employing this phrase, it's crucial to clearly identify the verification source to avoid ambiguity and strengthen the claim. Remember that while alternatives like "this was confirmed by" or "this was substantiated by" exist, they carry slightly different nuances. By following these guidelines, you can effectively communicate the validity of your information and enhance the trustworthiness of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

this was confirmed by

Replaces "verified" with "confirmed", indicating a strong affirmation of truth or accuracy.

this was substantiated by

Substitutes "verified" with "substantiated", implying that evidence supports the claim.

this was validated by

Uses "validated" instead of "verified", suggesting formal approval or authentication.

this was corroborated by

Replaces "verified" with "corroborated", emphasizing independent confirmation from multiple sources.

this was proven by

Substitutes "verified" with "proven", indicating a higher degree of certainty and conclusiveness.

evidence suggests

A more general phrasing that points towards supporting evidence without explicitly mentioning verification.

findings indicate

Emphasizes the role of research results in supporting a claim, rather than a direct verification process.

the data supports

Focuses on the supportive role of data in confirming a statement.

analysis confirms

Highlights the role of analysis in validating a statement.

research demonstrates

Stresses the demonstrative power of research in affirming a claim.

FAQs

How can I use "this was verified by" in a sentence?

Use "this was verified by" to indicate that a statement or finding has been confirmed through a specific method or source. For example, "The accuracy of the data was verified by /s/independent+auditors".

What are some alternatives to "this was verified by"?

Alternatives include "this was confirmed by", "this was substantiated by", or "this was validated by", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "this was verified by"?

While "this was verified by" uses passive voice, it's often suitable in formal or scientific writing where the focus is on the verification itself rather than the verifier. Active voice (e.g., "Researchers verified this") can be more direct.

What's the difference between "this was verified by" and "this was supported by"?

"This was verified by" implies a direct confirmation of accuracy, while "this was supported by" suggests that something is backed up by evidence but not necessarily definitively proven. Use "this was verified by" when the verification is explicit and conclusive.