Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
this was supported
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "this was supported" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to evidence or arguments that back up a claim or statement in a discussion or analysis. Example: "The findings of the study were significant, and this was supported by the data collected over the past year."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
This was supported by four curved legs, ornamented with scrolls.
Encyclopedias
Ryan said this was supported in principle but the government needed to see how it could be implemented.
News & Media
This was supported by environmental groups.
News & Media
This was supported by focus group discussions.
Science
This was supported by subjective feedback.
This was supported by quantitative analysis (Table 3).
This was supported by quantitative analyses shown in Table2.
Science
This was supported through qualitative content analysis [47].
This was supported by the results of infrared spectroscopy.
This was supported by a slight increase in ID/IG.
Science
This was supported by our noble gas results.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "this was supported", ensure the supporting evidence or argument is clearly identified in the preceding context. This provides clarity and strengthens the overall statement.
Common error
Avoid using "this was supported" without clearly indicating what "this" refers to. Ambiguity weakens the statement and can confuse the reader. Always ensure the referent is explicit.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "this was supported" functions as a passive construction indicating that a prior statement, claim, or idea has received validation, confirmation, or backing. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is correct and can be used to refer to evidence or arguments that back up a claim or statement.
Frequent in
Science
57%
News & Media
13%
Wiki
5%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
2%
Formal & Business
2%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "this was supported" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase that serves to validate or confirm a preceding statement. As Ludwig AI confirms, it indicates that evidence or arguments back up a claim. Its usage spans various contexts, especially science and news media, and its formality varies depending on the source, generally leaning towards neutral. Related phrases include "this was backed up" and "this was corroborated", offering alternatives for stylistic variation. To effectively use this phrase, ensure that the referenced "this" is clear and the supporting evidence is readily apparent.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
this was backed up
Replaces "supported" with "backed up", suggesting a strengthening or reinforcement of the original statement.
this was corroborated
Implies confirmation or validation of the statement through additional evidence or testimony.
this was confirmed
Suggests a verification of the statement's truth or accuracy.
this was validated
Indicates the statement has been formally assessed and found to be sound or justifiable.
this was substantiated
Suggests providing evidence to prove the truth of the statement.
this was reinforced
Implies strengthening the idea through further evidence or examples.
this was upheld
Suggests that a decision or statement was maintained or defended, often in a legal or formal context.
this received support
Rephrases the passive voice construction into an active one, while keeping a similar meaning.
evidence supported this
Inverts the sentence to emphasize the evidence providing the support.
data supported this
Highlights data as the source of validation or confirmation.
FAQs
What does "this was supported" mean in academic writing?
In academic writing, "this was supported" typically means that a claim, hypothesis, or finding is backed by evidence, data, or analysis. It signifies that the idea is not merely asserted but has some form of validation.
How can I replace "this was supported" to avoid repetition?
You can use alternatives like "this was backed up", "this was corroborated", or "this was confirmed" depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "support"?
Whether to use active or passive voice (e.g., "data supported this" vs. "this was supported") depends on the emphasis you want. Passive voice can be useful when the subject receiving the action is more important than the actor. Active voice emphasizes the source of support.
What kind of evidence is typically used to show something "was supported"?
The type of evidence used to show something "was supported" varies by field. In scientific contexts, it often involves experimental data or statistical analyses. In humanities, it may involve textual evidence or historical records.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested