Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

this was supported

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "this was supported" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to evidence or arguments that back up a claim or statement in a discussion or analysis. Example: "The findings of the study were significant, and this was supported by the data collected over the past year."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This was supported by four curved legs, ornamented with scrolls.

Ryan said this was supported in principle but the government needed to see how it could be implemented.

News & Media

The Guardian

This was supported by environmental groups.

News & Media

BBC

This was supported by focus group discussions.

This was supported by subjective feedback.

This was supported by quantitative analysis (Table 3).

This was supported by quantitative analyses shown in Table2.

This was supported through qualitative content analysis [47].

This was supported by the results of infrared spectroscopy.

This was supported by a slight increase in ID/IG.

This was supported by our noble gas results.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "this was supported", ensure the supporting evidence or argument is clearly identified in the preceding context. This provides clarity and strengthens the overall statement.

Common error

Avoid using "this was supported" without clearly indicating what "this" refers to. Ambiguity weakens the statement and can confuse the reader. Always ensure the referent is explicit.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "this was supported" functions as a passive construction indicating that a prior statement, claim, or idea has received validation, confirmation, or backing. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is correct and can be used to refer to evidence or arguments that back up a claim or statement.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

57%

News & Media

13%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "this was supported" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase that serves to validate or confirm a preceding statement. As Ludwig AI confirms, it indicates that evidence or arguments back up a claim. Its usage spans various contexts, especially science and news media, and its formality varies depending on the source, generally leaning towards neutral. Related phrases include "this was backed up" and "this was corroborated", offering alternatives for stylistic variation. To effectively use this phrase, ensure that the referenced "this" is clear and the supporting evidence is readily apparent.

FAQs

What does "this was supported" mean in academic writing?

In academic writing, "this was supported" typically means that a claim, hypothesis, or finding is backed by evidence, data, or analysis. It signifies that the idea is not merely asserted but has some form of validation.

How can I replace "this was supported" to avoid repetition?

You can use alternatives like "this was backed up", "this was corroborated", or "this was confirmed" depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "support"?

Whether to use active or passive voice (e.g., "data supported this" vs. "this was supported") depends on the emphasis you want. Passive voice can be useful when the subject receiving the action is more important than the actor. Active voice emphasizes the source of support.

What kind of evidence is typically used to show something "was supported"?

The type of evidence used to show something "was supported" varies by field. In scientific contexts, it often involves experimental data or statistical analyses. In humanities, it may involve textual evidence or historical records.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: